Jump to content

Help with a mathematical problem - which isn't ??


Recommended Posts

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One proposed (albeit simplistic) solution is to

> carry out two calculations based on the same sales

> turnover: but one using the actual cost figures of

> a Type B pub while the other uses figures

> commensurate with a Type A pub. Any difference in

> the result would be evidence of inequality.

> Furthermore, the difference can be equalised by

> iterating with a variable Profit to Rent Ratio

> until both A and B?type Landlord?s profits are the

> same. The resulting difference in the Ratios for A

> and B-type pubs would also serve to quantify the

> inequality.


Isn't the thing to work out what the average cost of beer is to each pub and express the cost of beer in a type B pub as a percentage of the cost of beer in a type A pub. Then should be able to turn into a formulae that shows for a given level of sales turnover and other costs, the profit as a % of sales turnover will be X% lower in a type B pub?

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't the thing to work out ...


Quite right. The OP sent me various documents in which tied and free market beer prices are tabulated. The actual math is quite straightforward. I think the OP needs someone like a qualified accountant, preferably with experience in this sector, to prepare a formal argument for use in court and/or the campaign. A credible, accredited expert witness, in other words.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> indiepanda Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Isn't the thing to work out ...

>

> Quite right. The OP sent me various documents in

> which tied and free market beer prices are

> tabulated. The actual math


Sss.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL9000 Wrote:

> -------------------------------------------------------

> > The actual math

>

> Sss.


Quoting from Mathematics:



Etymology


The word "mathematics" comes from the Greek μάθημα (m?thēma), which means learning, study, science, and additionally came to have the narrower and more technical meaning "mathematical study", even in Classical times. Its adjective is μαθηματικός (mathēmatik?s), related to learning, or studious, which likewise further came to mean mathematical. In particular, μαθηματικὴ τέχνη (mathēmatikḗ t?khnē), in Latin ars mathematica, meant the mathematical art.


The apparent plural form in English, like the French plural form les math?matiques (and the less commonly used singular derivative la math?matique), goes back to the Latin neuter plural mathematica (Cicero), based on the Greek plural τα μαθηματικά (ta mathēmatik?), used by Aristotle, and meaning roughly "all things mathematical"; although it is plausible that English borrowed only the adjective mathematic(al) and formed the noun mathematics anew, after the pattern of physics and metaphysics, which were inherited from the Greek. In English, the noun mathematics takes singular verb forms. It is often shortened to maths, or math in English-speaking North America.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you . Its as if they have their foot in the door and are just pushing and pushing. It's ridiculous. It's not the right space. they clearly do not give any regard to the environment or they would move it.  
    • There's a great badminton club at the Harris girls academy. It runs Friday from 5.30 to 6.45. for more experienced players, they have sessions on Wednesday and Friday, too but that's subject to skill levels 
    • There seem to be all sorts of blocks for this event being mounted on the Common, one is that it was 'designed especially' for the current site, though the organisers seem to have had absolutely no problem rejigging their plans to the original site footprint to expand the event to what we had last year- which I think really imposed on a large part of the park and spoilt the feel. I would suggest pressing very hard for relocation to the Common ( also closer to transport links). There must be a way, surely? If not, then wholesale relocation to a more suitable venue. I just do not think the park should be subjected to a festival-goer footfall of 60,000 plus over the summer.
    • I absolutely will. Fed up of property developments that are funded from offshore investors and price out local people. Fed up of the demise of social rents and the growing crisis of families in bed and breakfast. Fed up of young people being unable to save deposits, start families and generally have the same security of tenure that previous generations had. So yes, I will drill down into the financing, affordability, where the properties aer being advertised for sale, and how many are genuinely for social rent. Otherwise, no opposition to redeveloping that site in that way. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...