Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah... think the Polish builders started doing

> well back in the 2000s because of the work ethic,

> not the price.



Exactly. Polish builders are known to be better and harder working, not just cheaper.

Before the East European builders came the whole construction sector apprenticeships and training had been neglected for some years because the powers that be thought that kids should get loads of GCSEs and go to uni. Obviously when there was a skills gap it was much cheaper and easier to let in foreigners (we could have had 2 years' grace like France and Germany had but the Labour government didn't take it)than to train the British kids. Also when the East Europeans came they were renting housing en masse (my sister is an estate agent in East London and regularly let homes to 6 or more of them) whereas our tradesmen had mortgages, children etc to provide for and could not live in that way. A friend who is an electrician had regular work and then found he was competing against men charging ?20 a day - then he was called in to issue a certificate (renewing the qualification is expensive for a self-employed electrician or gas-fitter btw) and after inspections found several that were sub-standard. Wiring too close to the edge of floor boards for example.

A whole sector of society has been massively let down by a system that puts great store on academic achievement, and at the same time has ripped away the system that enabled the working classes to actually realise their potential.

Just goes to show that Labour is no friend of the working class and exploits it relentlessly and always has done.

The Polish builders were initially distrusted, but, as LM says, proved themselves to be excellent, hard-working builders who created a real name for themselves, at a time where local builders were really taking the piss.


No doubt there were a couple of dodgy ones in there, but that's the case with local ones as well.

There is some real pompous stuff in here, sadly what I am beginning to expect from many of you who are up your own rrrrsss

And sweeping generalisations. Just look at what you post.

Poish builders are painted out to be from another planet

We are all the same species FFS

More importantly sod the politics and please comment on the lamest pop video on a separate thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...