Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Both my girls have been through DCPS nursery and both have enjoyed it hugely. There are enough girls for them not to be dominated by the boys but also few enough of them to feel special.


They have great fun, are taught well with huge imagination and tenderness from excellent teachers. I didn't see any disadvantage to the girls.


Depending on the girl's birthday she will have either 1 or two years there before moving on. My elder daughter had 2 years and loved every minute of it. My younger only had 1 year (I wish she could have had 2).

Funny that you should ask this as I have been wondering. My two are a school year apart (2 year older boy, 1 year old girl) and I have his name down there. I was pondering whether to think about Herne Hill or Oakfield instead as they are more co-ed for when they are both there/she is there on her own, but that has put my mind at rest a bit. I love the facilities and outside space at DCPS.

Mothercourage June birthdays (like my youngest daughter) are there for a year so they go when they have just turned 3and leave after they have just turned 4.


Mellors If your children are a school year apart they may be in the same year at DCPS nursery (again depends on birthdays) and so you could have them in the same class (not sure if you would think this is a good idea or not).


The nursery facilities are superb - the new building, playground, field and woods are lovely and well used in the teaching there. The only problem is, of course, that girls move at 4. At Herne Hill they have to move at 7 (which is a much more stressful move then at 4 because of the exams) but at Oakfield they can continue until 11 I think.


If you are considering DCPS for your little boy Mellors, definitely look at it for your little girl. It is a wonderful environment for both boys and girls.

Yes she will.


She would go when she was just 3, do 1 year and move up to reception (in a different school) when she had only just turned 4.


I also think in that case your son would be the year above her so he would go for 1 year, then as he goes into DCPS reception year your daughter would go into year 1 of the nursery. Is your son's assessment this coming January?

Yes that sounds right, he would start next Sept (when nearly 4), and she would be the year after (a few days after she is 3).


Hmmmm, possibly not worth it then as she would only be there for a year and then I would have to move her, which is a faff. I don't have time in a morning to drop off at two places before going to work, so back to Plan B I think. Its all so complicated!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...