Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TheKiwi thinks that the internet has two purposes only:

a) Filling forums with (generally) misguided waffle

b) Ordering the occasional book from Amazon (Tom Clancy, or similar, I expect)


And judging by his previous.. (and totally bizarre).. "stay away from MySpace.. it's full of paedophiles" outburst, it's no wonder something like secondlife wouldn't appeal. Perhaps it, too, is FULL OF PAEDOPHILES.

I have had a quick look at the demo, in the same way that I decided to go to the millennium dome in order to be able to slag that off too.

It's desperately dull with some of the clunkiest graphics and interface I've ever seen. I've briefly *ahem* been sucked into the likes of eve and world of warcraft, and whereas I understand that these too are desperately geeky, there is at least some sort of purpose, and and enjoyment in them.


Why would anyone 'play' second life. If you want to set up a shop then do it down your high st, you might actually make some money, and your customers won't be strange avatars from the wrong side of the uncanny valley

Thanks for all this "constructive" comments, my original question is " has anyone any experience on secondlife" ? I NEVER said I played, my interest is sparked by the fact that someone has made serious money on it and large companies are moving in buying lands to advertise their products... I am not intersted in playing secondlife as I am too busy with my first and ONLY life... to me secondlife could be a potential source of money... That is why I am still interested in "being illuminated" by a secondlife expert.....

Thanks again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ahh, that's too bad. The SLP was always on sale in Sainsbury's and always available in libraries. They did some really detailed local crime reporting and local government reporting that other outlets wouldn't focus on.
    • Miranda Sawyer of the (once) Observer has done a piece on festival on Insta which might be of-interest.  Councils are private companies, imo. They make money for themselves, imo.  I do not think by law that they have to follow anything brought up by a consultation, this is for 'face' only - hence, LTNs and everything else.  
    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
    • Meson Don Felipe on The Cut was my go to place for many years. Though it's now many years since I was there. 10-15 minute walk from the Tate. If you go can you tell me what it's like nowadays?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...