Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isis is very difficult dilemma I don?t think

> bombing them will actually work, and you can?t

> reason with a prehistoric ideology so I am not

> sure on this one and Iam not saying do nothing

> either.


Not unless you carpet bomb - and that is not seen as right (Dresden was terrible).


Russia might however


http://theaviationist.com/2015/11/18/tu-22m3-carpet-bombing-receiving-end/

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I supported Corbyn as he would drag the whole

> political debate leftwards -- and he has.

> Osborne will be centre-left soon.


Really think it's a stretch to suggest that this is a result of Corbyn.


If anything the lack of credible opposition has given the tories more freedom.

Dog duck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stupid Tory boy Cameron reckons bombing isis will

> make it safer here... Twat! They're here already?


There's a Guardian article which asks why we think attacks against Russia

are linked to them getting involved whilst assuming attacks against us are

due to our Western values.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a civil war in Syria. Russia supports the

> existing regime, the others the rebels. Then

> there's IS. How the hell do you know who you are

> bombing?


You don't - unless you have spotters on the ground.


Do NATO (maybe) Do Russia (doubt it)

War has been a tactic for deflecting from issues at home used by many governments. Nothing like a bit of patriotic fervour to whip up votes. That's cynical I know but nobody is talking about what Saudi Arabia are currently doing in Yemen for example. There is no way to bomb and avoid civilian casualties. The revenge bombing by the French after Paris killed 73 civilians, many of them children for example. Yet all but one of the terrorists were European born! You can not bomb an ideology out of existence. This is the disconnect in those for bombing.


What you can do however, is shut down routes of funding (swiss banks btw) and the routes for arms smuggling (hard to do when we are one of the four biggest arms traders flooding the world with these weapons). And of course, homeland intelligence is the most effective way of seeking out these cells.


Long term, we have to find ways to stop disaffected men and women from becoming radicalised. From a psychological perspective, nationals who subscribe to these ideologies are often 2nd or 3rd generation, migrant descendants, who feel no sense of cultural identity and loyalty, either to the culture of their parents and their country of origin, or to the culture of the country they are born into. THAT is what we have to tackle within our own society.


As for Syria, as pointed out above, it is a conflict between four different sides with different aims. There can be no military intervention until NATO and her allies sit down and work out a strategy to which all are signed up, including local leaders and forces on the ground. Without that, any action is doomed to fail and hurt ordinary innocent people most. It will lead to a refugee movement on a scale far bigger than anything we have seen yet.


And finally there is the cost of action. Who will be paying for the bombs we drop? I don't want my taxes being used to kill civilians halfway around the world. Iraq was an unmitigated disaster. I see nothing in Cameron that understands that.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Every British PM has to have Their War...

>

> Thatcher The Falklands..

>

> Blair Iraq in both 1998 and 2003, Kosovo (1999),

> Sierra Leone (2000) and Afghanistan (2001).

>

> Cameron Afghanistan , Iraq, Syria..

>

> DulwichFox



And the Falklands and Sierra Leone seen as a success ?


Corbyn could easily have the last laugh here (it won't win him much though).

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isis is very difficult dilemma I don?t think

> bombing them will actually work, and you can?t

> reason with a prehistoric ideology so I am not

> sure on this one and Iam not saying do nothing

> either.


A minor correction: their ideology is anything but prehistoric ? it is to use modern technology and communications in such a way to further their religious aims. These are not the anti-modernity Taliban, but a relatively young bunch who are enthusiastic users of 21st-century technology.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ridgley Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Isis is very difficult dilemma I don?t think

> > bombing them will actually work, and you can?t

> > reason with a prehistoric ideology so I am not

> > sure on this one and Iam not saying do nothing

> > either.

>

> A minor correction: their ideology is anything but

> prehistoric ? it is to use modern technology and

> communications in such a way to further their

> religious aims. These are not the anti-modernity

> Taliban, but a relatively young bunch who are

> enthusiastic users of 21st-century technology.


But the aim is to fight the western nations at the

place described in the Koran as Armageddon (not the

same as the one in the old testament - it's Dabiq in

Syria).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dabiq


That's what a lot of observers are saying anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why are we even discussing this?  If Trump gets the Nobel Peace Prize he can put in on the mantelpiece with his dodgy golf trophies. We all know he is an egotist and an award wont suddenly make us admire him. Worth catching up on Radio 4's Newsquiz that was discussing the peace deal and Trump as I was typing my previous post.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006r9yq
    • Hi all Fantastic experience with Paul - after a disaster experience with another local electrician (not Paul!) who failed to declare he was not registered. Watch out.  Paul is very affable, technically brilliant and set about rectifying a poorly done job. Certificates sent immediately. The finished work looks immaculate - I hope he does not mind me posting this pic. an excellent tradesman who cares.  For your sake don’t waste your time with others- call him.  james   
    • https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/keir-starmer-donald-trump-nobel-peace-prize-gaza-deal-b1252133.html?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1760028650.   That's how it was reported at the time. Most sources now are saying he would not be drawn on whether Trump deserved the Nobel peace prize for Gaza.
    • I'm finding this rather bizarre, rather than be cautiously optimistic some of you look at this to have an opportunity to have a go at Starmer and Trump.  The former has to adopt an approach this involves flattery to get any influence over the most powerful person in the world.  Sure he could and should have gone harder in terms of Gaza and opposing the genocide, and there are some questions over some arms sales.  I expect now we have vicars as terrorists the PA decision will prove wrong.  There are those in his own party who will continue to press him on this.  48 percent of the country say they would vote for a right wing party if their was an election today. Farage reportedly has denied that there is a genocide ongoing in Gaza and said he would not block any weapons exports to Israel if Reform UK came to power.  Badenoch's own words (on X) Recognising a Palestinian state won't bring the hostages home, won't end the war and won't get aid into Gaza. So it's reasonable to assume that around half the country would not support a stronger stance on criticising Israel's action. I don't have a lot of good things to say about Trump.  Yet if he can or has brought about a stable solution in Gaza then that will be great news.  That he didn't do this earlier, and in my view caused so many problems with the move of their embassy which in turn may have emboldened Hamas, remain valid issues, as do what the US is going to get out of it. As regards to earlier debate.  Israel protecting the UK from Iran just sounds bizarre.  The UK's position is that extensive diplomacy and a deal is the way forward. Yes there are so many other conflicts in the world that don't get the same level of attention.  But how many of these are directly due to a western democracy's extreme military action and starvation against a territory? I'm with the march in spirit but for apathy or whatever reason wont be there.  For those of you who consider it is antisemitic go and join the march and see.  I went to one of the large earlier demos and there was such a friendly and positive spirit despite the cause.  Yet the media pick on the occasional extreme incident, highly selective.  I'd prefer of they called it a peace protest rather than a pro-Palestine march.  I think it is right to look at the immediate desperate situation, and decouple from the longer term - albeit that the two station solution has to be the way forward and Israeli settlements are wrong.  Hopefully once there is a proper peace Netanyahu will go one way or another (I'm taking prosecution).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...