Does anyone else miss TLS's + Bigbadwolf's posts?

[*Bob*]

Would you like a bandage for your foot?

You shouldn't play with guns, you know.

[*Bob*]

Would you like a bandage for your foot?

You shouldn't play with guns, you know.

[Mick Mac]

i think hugenot if you clearly stated that you received a pm and you knew that you did not then you deliberately mis represented tony to the rest of the forum.

I think therefore he deserves an apology, irrespective of what you think of his views.

[Mick Mac]

i think hugenot if you clearly stated that you received a pm and you knew that you did not then you deliberately mis represented tony to the rest of the forum.

I think therefore he deserves an apology, irrespective of what you think of his views.

[????]

edited for being school playground

[????]

edited for being school playground

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

Lay off the chap. Just cos he hasn't answered to your timetable, doesn't mean he won't. And I know he doesn't need me to stand up for him, but this is all coming across as petulant schoolboys.

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

Lay off the chap. Just cos he hasn't answered to your timetable, doesn't mean he won't. And I know he doesn't need me to stand up for him, but this is all coming across as petulant schoolboys.

[*Bob*]

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lay off the chap. Just cos he hasn't answered to

> your timetable, doesn't mean he won't. And I know

> he doesn't need me to stand up for him, but this

> is all coming across as petulant schoolboys.

You could read the thread and make you own mind up?

[*Bob*]

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lay off the chap. Just cos he hasn't answered to

> your timetable, doesn't mean he won't. And I know

> he doesn't need me to stand up for him, but this

> is all coming across as petulant schoolboys.

You could read the thread and make you own mind up?

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

I have read the thread, and I'm not saying he isn't wrong. What I do know of Hugenot however, is that he would consider the above and admit to a mistake if he feels one has been made.

I just don't see that because he hasn't come back to this thread in a nanosecond, he needs to be jumped on even more.

[Peckhamgatecrasher]

I have read the thread, and I'm not saying he isn't wrong. What I do know of Hugenot however, is that he would consider the above and admit to a mistake if he feels one has been made.

I just don't see that because he hasn't come back to this thread in a nanosecond, he needs to be jumped on even more.

[????]

Bob's post is fair enough mine does look a bit choolplaygroundish agreed PGC, Can a mod remove it

[????]

Bob's post is fair enough mine does look a bit choolplaygroundish agreed PGC, Can a mod remove it

[*Bob*]

It's not my fault that Hugenot lives halfway round the world.

I'm sure he'll get back to us at a time convenient for the time zone he's in. Unfortunately, that won't be convenient for me because I'll probably be in bed. Or watching X-Factor or something, so there you have it.

[*Bob*]

It's not my fault that Hugenot lives halfway round the world.

I'm sure he'll get back to us at a time convenient for the time zone he's in. Unfortunately, that won't be convenient for me because I'll probably be in bed. Or watching X-Factor or something, so there you have it.

[Huguenot]

It was a long time ago, and I thought it was a pm - whether it was a pm or a public thread is quibbling. I rather think that those who felt it was bad form to quote a pm would be satisfed it was a thread? That thread wasn't the only one, but it's a typical example. He made similar insinuations on other threads.

I don't think that someone making enquiries about my 'safety' is doing so to quell anxieties, do you? If you think I'm taking him the wrong way then fine, but I really don't see that the suggestion we should return to fifties culture as a thinly veiled re-working of 'blacks out' could be interpreted as anything but nasty.

Quids, you're an apologist for someone who believes in racial profiling. Conversely I'm highlighting insinuations that were made persistently over a long period. Who's committing the greater crime here?

[Huguenot]

It was a long time ago, and I thought it was a pm - whether it was a pm or a public thread is quibbling. I rather think that those who felt it was bad form to quote a pm would be satisfed it was a thread? That thread wasn't the only one, but it's a typical example. He made similar insinuations on other threads.

I don't think that someone making enquiries about my 'safety' is doing so to quell anxieties, do you? If you think I'm taking him the wrong way then fine, but I really don't see that the suggestion we should return to fifties culture as a thinly veiled re-working of 'blacks out' could be interpreted as anything but nasty.

Quids, you're an apologist for someone who believes in racial profiling. Conversely I'm highlighting insinuations that were made persistently over a long period. Who's committing the greater crime here?

[*Bob*]

Well there you have it.

On this occasion.. 'sorry' certainly does seem to be the hardest word.

[*Bob*]

Well there you have it.

On this occasion.. 'sorry' certainly does seem to be the hardest word.

[LegalEagle-ish]

Lol, I agree with Huggie cos with someone who drip drips their insults and threats, you can't point to one bit and get the whole flavour.

I'm satisfied that TLS is guilty as charged!

[LegalEagle-ish]

Lol, I agree with Huggie cos with someone who drip drips their insults and threats, you can't point to one bit and get the whole flavour.

I'm satisfied that TLS is guilty as charged!

[daizie]

Im not . Id say that was down to your own insecurities . Where is the evidence ?

[daizie]

Im not . Id say that was down to your own insecurities . Where is the evidence ?

[LegalEagle-ish]

Daizie - what insecurities?