Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would YOU lend Greece a few quid? They're on their way out, they've effectively defaulted already, the markets know it and I suspect the politicians do too.


Bild is by far Germanies best selling newspaper but it is read by those horrible plebs rather than the oh so knoeledgable elite you love so much.


The games up.

  • 1 month later...

EU 'to vet British Budget before Parliament'


"The European Union will vet the Chancellor's Budget before it is debated by MPs in the House of Commons or seen by the public, under plans agreed last night.


Mr Van Rompuy and the European Commission have tabled plans that will require all of Europe?s governments to discuss their budget plans with other EU finance ministers and officials before they presented to national parliaments..."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/7809991/EU-to-vet-British-Budget-before-Parliament.html


Er...Hello...a good old fashioned Anglo-Saxon expletive springs to mind

Personally I think it in the EUs best interest to cut ties with Britain completely. It?s not like these islands don?t already have form for being an outwardly aggressive, xenophobic liability. Why they would want them in the fold in the first place is anyone?s guess.



Although I suppose they tolerate France despite the same.

My one of my biggest concerns with Europe is that if a truly politically/economically and even culturally unified Europe emerges instead of it preventing potential conflict it will cause more. Suddenly Europe may look at how powerful it is and decide to have a crack at China or America.
Well culturally the European people aren?t as different from one another as they like to think in fact a lot of them are practically identical apart from their languages and pretty soon we will all just be speaking American anyway. The rest is politics and economics. So given a generation or 2 it could happen.
  • 9 months later...

People confuse the idea of 'nation' and 'state'.


A nation is a social and cultural construct, a state is an administrative region.


Quids thinks there can be no European agreement because it'll never be a 'nation'. I don't disagree with him that the totalitarian tendencies necessary to creating homogenous 'nations' are in the past for Western Europe.


However I fundamentally disagree that this stands in the way of creating a state. I'm also convinced that statehood is necessary in a world of dwindling resources to gain Europe a fair share in the face of Chinese, Indian and US imperial inclinations.


Most 'nations' were built by the arbitrary identification of 'state' borders, and the indoctrination of children through education into a unified concept of genetic nationality.


'Nations' are for mugs and the Balkans.


Despite popular myth, the UK has never really been a 'nation' in the 'one people' sense of the word. Every region has strong separatist ideals. The same applies to all of the european super-nations of Germany, France, Italy and Spain.


When Cameron, Merkel and others claim that multiculturalism has failed, they are merely protesting that the natural consequence of an educated society is a reduction in the need for blind tribalism that hangs 'nations' together.


They would do better to focus on the elements of statehood that would best serve their electorate, and stop trying to sustain antiquated medieval concepts beyond their natural life.

Not really. There's pretty practical food for thought if a European State is to compete in a multipolar world for markets and resources.

The most pro European (and least successful imperial power thinking about it) of the big European powers is Spain.

it's no coincidence that it has enjoyed the least success in subjagating local identities for a national project.

The most successful is France* and still has the biggest issues with racism, anti-semitism and thinking the A europeman superstate will actually be a greater France (speaking French of course).


But these are hurdles that need to be overcome if we are to compete/survive in the future, and maintaining a smaller sense of identity with a coexisting non-nationalistic sense of integration (call it multicultarism if you will, humanism might be a better description) seems to me a pretty good step forward in resolving some of these issues.


Plus who cares if someone else said something, are not even dull truisms worth repeating if they're useful? More useful than *yawn, that's like, so 300 AD* ;-P


*20th century Germany is a weird political aberration, 21st century Germany is a very different beast, err animal, err thingy

And no doubt you would have been just as cynical about the idea of a unified England 1000 years ago, a unified India 200 years ago or a unified South Africa 100 years ago.



Granted they have all ended up as pretty shit places to live but the idea of disparate nations unifying under a centralised administration is demonstrably workable.

Noo, I'm saying unification is workable, but it doesn't need to be achieved by subscribing to some bullshit ideal.

I'm pretty sure people can be pragmatic about pooling resources, about free movement of labour and removal of internal barriers whilst celebrating difference and without the need to subjugate a sense of identity to some wider goal.


Nationalism may have positive aspects in empire building, war fighting and industrial endeavour (which apart from the latter are of course bad things), but the negative aspects far outweigh the positive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...