Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm pregnant and won't qualify for statutory maternity pay (SMP) but will qualify for maternity allowance (MA) because I'm self employed.


Directgov states the conditions for MA as follows:


You may be eligible if:


you've been employed and/or self-employed for at least 26 weeks in your 'test period' (66 weeks up to and including the week before the week your baby is due). Part weeks count as full weeks; and

you earned ?30 a week averaged over any 13 weeks in your test period


And it states the calculation of the amount as follows:


Maternity Allowance pays a standard weekly rate of ?123.06 or 90 per cent of your average gross weekly earnings (before tax), whichever is the smaller.



My question is: is MA calculated over the entire 66 week period (including all the weeks you weren't working and therefore had zero income, making the average income over the entire 66 week period very low) or only over the weeks you were actually employed and generating an income? I was a stay-at-home mum for most of 2009 and will have only worked for about 42 weeks in the aforementioned 'week before the week my baby is due'.


Thanks for any insights anyone can give me! Will probably call them next week but am getting a bit nervous...

I'm pregnant and won't qualify for statutory maternity pay (SMP) but will qualify for maternity allowance (MA) because I'm self employed.


Directgov states the conditions for MA as follows:


You may be eligible if:


you've been employed and/or self-employed for at least 26 weeks in your 'test period' (66 weeks up to and including the week before the week your baby is due). Part weeks count as full weeks; and

you earned ?30 a week averaged over any 13 weeks in your test period


And it states the calculation of the amount as follows:


Maternity Allowance pays a standard weekly rate of ?123.06 or 90 per cent of your average gross weekly earnings (before tax), whichever is the smaller.



My question is: is MA calculated over the entire 66 week period (including all the weeks you weren't working and therefore had zero income, making the average income over the entire 66 week period very low) or only over the weeks you were actually employed and generating an income? I was a stay-at-home mum for most of 2009 and will have only worked for about 42 weeks in the aforementioned 'week before the week my baby is due'.


Thanks for any insights anyone can give me! Will probably call them next week but am getting a bit nervous...

I believe it is based on your gross earnings for any 13 weeks of your choice during the test period (the 66 weeks before the week you expect to give birth). The 13 weeks do not have to be consecutive.


Here is a link to the application form, which has details on it: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/advisers/claimforms/ma1_print.pdf

I believe it is based on your gross earnings for any 13 weeks of your choice during the test period (the 66 weeks before the week you expect to give birth). The 13 weeks do not have to be consecutive.


Here is a link to the application form, which has details on it: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/advisers/claimforms/ma1_print.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m not a Gail’s fan but there’s no reason a business shouldn’t open on Christmas Day. However, nobody should be compelled to work the day which, given the widespread coverage of Gail’s questionable employment practices, has to be a possibility here.  The only business I ever use on the 25th is maybe a pub and that’s a rarity these days but buses running would be very welcome for visiting etc. But the swings in the park should definitely remain chained up. Are parks even open on Christmas Day?
    • To be honest, pal, it's not good being a fan of a local business and then not go there. One on hand, the barber shop literally next door to Romeo Jones started serving coffee. The Crown and Greyhound and Rocca serve coffee. Redemption Coffee opened up not far away, and then also Megan's next door to that. DVillage was serving coffee (but wasn't very popular), as was Au Ciel (which is). Maybe also Heritage Cheese, I don't know. There's also Flotsam and Jetsam doing coffee and sandwiches at Dulwich Picture Gallery in the other direction. The whole of Dulwich Village serves coffee. And yet on the other hand, there are enough punters to support all good coffee shops. With the exception of Rocca and Megan's (which are both big spaces) and C&G (which does coffee like everything else - slow and with bad service), all these places regularly get queues out the door. Gail's often has big queues and yet very few people crossed the street to Romeo Jones (which was much better)... Half the staff at Gail's are perfectly fine and efficient. The other half are pretty offhand and rude. It's certainly not welcoming or friendly service. But they're certainly hard working, and no doubt raking the money in for Luke Johnson...
    • Well according to a newspaper article, Gail’s is opening 10 shops in London,,, yup Dulwich is named 10/5 I seem to recall with others in London opening at 7 am…!, Guess that is to capture workers coming off all night shift. Offering free mince pies until they run out.. So very sad to hear about Romeo Jones… been a customer since the opening, any idea where Patrick has gone or details… please pm me.    What is going to be in its place…. Will be around in Jan…umm village is changing….
    • interesting the police said "the car was in demand at the moment" what make/model is that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...