Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm pregnant and won't qualify for statutory maternity pay (SMP) but will qualify for maternity allowance (MA) because I'm self employed.


Directgov states the conditions for MA as follows:


You may be eligible if:


you've been employed and/or self-employed for at least 26 weeks in your 'test period' (66 weeks up to and including the week before the week your baby is due). Part weeks count as full weeks; and

you earned ?30 a week averaged over any 13 weeks in your test period


And it states the calculation of the amount as follows:


Maternity Allowance pays a standard weekly rate of ?123.06 or 90 per cent of your average gross weekly earnings (before tax), whichever is the smaller.



My question is: is MA calculated over the entire 66 week period (including all the weeks you weren't working and therefore had zero income, making the average income over the entire 66 week period very low) or only over the weeks you were actually employed and generating an income? I was a stay-at-home mum for most of 2009 and will have only worked for about 42 weeks in the aforementioned 'week before the week my baby is due'.


Thanks for any insights anyone can give me! Will probably call them next week but am getting a bit nervous...

I'm pregnant and won't qualify for statutory maternity pay (SMP) but will qualify for maternity allowance (MA) because I'm self employed.


Directgov states the conditions for MA as follows:


You may be eligible if:


you've been employed and/or self-employed for at least 26 weeks in your 'test period' (66 weeks up to and including the week before the week your baby is due). Part weeks count as full weeks; and

you earned ?30 a week averaged over any 13 weeks in your test period


And it states the calculation of the amount as follows:


Maternity Allowance pays a standard weekly rate of ?123.06 or 90 per cent of your average gross weekly earnings (before tax), whichever is the smaller.



My question is: is MA calculated over the entire 66 week period (including all the weeks you weren't working and therefore had zero income, making the average income over the entire 66 week period very low) or only over the weeks you were actually employed and generating an income? I was a stay-at-home mum for most of 2009 and will have only worked for about 42 weeks in the aforementioned 'week before the week my baby is due'.


Thanks for any insights anyone can give me! Will probably call them next week but am getting a bit nervous...

I believe it is based on your gross earnings for any 13 weeks of your choice during the test period (the 66 weeks before the week you expect to give birth). The 13 weeks do not have to be consecutive.


Here is a link to the application form, which has details on it: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/advisers/claimforms/ma1_print.pdf

I believe it is based on your gross earnings for any 13 weeks of your choice during the test period (the 66 weeks before the week you expect to give birth). The 13 weeks do not have to be consecutive.


Here is a link to the application form, which has details on it: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/advisers/claimforms/ma1_print.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...