Jump to content

Recommended Posts

so you want to introduce the death penalty and hand it over to a corrupt judiciary? No thanks


Could it be Steve, that the death penalty doesn't deter crime?


Could it be that if you were interested in reducing crime rates (instead of killing people) you could look for solid examples of democracies across the world without the death penalty?

It's probably a generational thing Sean, I'm of the generation where people of my age think that the ne'erdowells should get there just deserts.


Ideally it should be seen to be done too.


If people behave like animals, they should be put down like animals, then they will no longer behave like animals.

well, quite, snunca


It reminds me of the great philosopher and rapper Fur Q


You gotta kill people so they respect you.. but you can't kill all of them.. because...


@ theChair - that IS on topic as it shows up the absurdity of capital punishment!

ok .. now I'm slightly worried that you really think that I think Fur Q is


a) a philosopher

b) a real character and not a satire by Chris Morris


The link between capital punishment and the the sketch is exemplified by huncamunca's comment - ie if you want a totally crime free world then it's possible but.... Of course hunca being hunca I can't be 100% sure he/she doesn't also genuinely believe that ;-)

No, I wouldn't insult your intelligence by pretending I believed you seriously meant that line of argument.


Seriously, I think people have to accept the argument that Capital Punishment as a deterrent doesn't work and is absurd. However, as some posters above have mentioned, Capital Punishment as society's revenge isn't absurd. The idea that a society can find certain categories of crime so abhorrent that the punishment is death on the basis that the perpetrator has forfeited the right to live within that society and also that justice is seen to be done is not absurd.


Whether we regard such a position as right or wrong is of course open for debate. But it is not absurd.


(edited for typo)

It might be a generational thing but I'm more interested in what works


Let's just be absolutely clear here about one thing. It most certainly is not a "generation thing" as SteveT suggests. I have always been against the death penalty: I find it wrong on every level. Enoch Powell, with whose views I have almost nothing in common, also opposed the death penalty and he was not only far older than I am even now but also far more right wing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Vans are restricted to one hour a day 8:30 to 9:30 and have to be pre-booked.  So long as you went with and were able to show the right ID then I doubt it would be an issue unless the builders van is emblazoned with their branding as businesses aren't allowed to use it.
    • Perhaps they would run into the issue that Lambeth had if they put it on the  Rye - maybe they would need planning permission for change of use if more than 28 days of permitted development are used up for all the other events plus this. So perhaps emphasising that the two areas are distinct from each other actually helps the council.
    • I think the council could make more of that too. Sell a ticketed event with a local celebrity turning the lights on, followed by a street party with christmas carols and a christmas pop song cover band.
    • When we had lots of rubble to dispose of, we hired a zip an and took it. Didn't have to pay, but they don't allow vans in Sundays from memory 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...