Jump to content

Oil at $40 a barrell...lucky escape for the sweaties


Recommended Posts

Everyone's forecasts are laughable in hindsight. The SNP chose the most optimistic figures and the UK Government the most conservative.


Both were wrong, along with most of the banks (Goldmans were forecasting $100 a barrel against the SNP's $110)

Yeah - agree that while those predictions seem laughable now, they weren't wildly out of line with what "the experts" thought. Anyway - if at the time someone thought they were laughable they could have made a pretty penny by now based on their "realistic" expectations.
Yeah but the forecasts aren't the point, in a way they illustrate the whole risky idea; the gambling on oil when you're a one trick pony is the reckless bit when you can stay with your lovely, sensible neighbours. We'd have had to have armed guards on the border by now.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah but the forecasts aren't the point, in a way

> they illustrate the whole risky idea; the gambling

> on oil when you're a one trick pony is the

> reckless bit when you can stay with your lovely,

> sensible neighbours. We'd have had to have armed

> guards on the border by now.


Uh, you mean Engand's financial one trick pony financial services?!


Let's have a look at the Bank of England's "cover all bases" forecasting, i.e. anything between -1% and +4% is "on target" http://blogs.ft.com/the-world/liveblogs/2014-11-12-2/

England's financial services would be fine without having the Bits fooked up by the Scottish banking mafia Sir Fred and the RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland) HQ Edinboro' and HBOS - guess what the BOS stands for and the Scottish based BOS was mainly responsible for the horrendous commercial property loans that took out HBOS and yet Pravda SNP still blamed the 'spivs in the City' rather than the spivs in Edinboro

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ...even for Corbyn's Marxist leninist mob?

>

> yep. At least you know where you are with them.


Yup. Marching round Grosvenor Square circa 1968

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...not to mention the custodians of the country

> and economy at that time Messrs Brown and

> Darling...now where they from?



Yes. because it never went wrong under Thatcher, Major and Lamont - oh wait!!!!

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> England's financial services would be fine without

> having the Bits fooked up by the Scottish banking

> mafia Sir Fred and the RBS (Royal Bank of

> Scotland) HQ Edinboro' and HBOS - guess what the

> BOS stands for and the Scottish based BOS was

> mainly responsible for the horrendous commercial

> property loans that took out HBOS and yet Pravda

> SNP still blamed the 'spivs in the City' rather

> than the spivs in Edinboro



Hang on, hang on...one of the key factors that sunk RBS in 2008 was the disastrous takeover of ABN Amro (2007/2008), a takeover they *won* ahead of Barclays, which both were dead set on. There but for the grace of God etc...Also, and this is the bigger problem with what you said, it's naive to think of any of these big banks as "national" banks servicing some kind of nationalist agenda. Certain "types" cluster in the leadership teams, but this has not much to do with the bank's country of origin. Long bow.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A bit like pinning your economy on just the city

> and property even ;)


Well, that's two (non-commodity) sectors already...But "the City", however you choose to define it, often has its importance to the overall economy a bit overstated anyway*. The whole financial sector makes up less than 10% of the overall economy**. As anyone with an expensive education in something very useful like economy or political sciences knows***, it's the buying and selling of capuccinos that keeps all western economies ticking along.


*different topic

**www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn06193.pdf

***not useful

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A bit like pinning your economy on just the

> city

> > and property even ;)

>

> Well, that's two (non-commodity) sectors

> already...But "the City", however you choose to

> define it, often has its importance to the overall

> economy a bit overstated anyway*. The whole

> financial sector makes up less than 10% of the

> overall economy**. As anyone with an expensive

> education in something very useful like economy or

> political sciences knows***, it's the buying and

> selling of capuccinos that keeps all western

> economies ticking along.

>

> *different topic

> **www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn06193.pdf

> ***not useful


Plus You need to add on all the interconnected services that benefit from the 'spivs' - legal & consultamcy being the high profile ones; plus the property; high end goods & services etc etc.


Bit more than some dead animals in the North Sea bed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...