Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To be fair, absolutely nothing that was written after the OP (whatever it was) would have made a blind bit of difference to thie welfare of this child. The OP called the police, then they started this thread to make people aware. In terms of "doing something" that's all that could be done.
I agree buddug. It seems more than a bit disrespectful to this child to hitch a ride on a thread about her welfare to have your say about anything other than her welfare. I hope op has had helpful pms which move this case onwards.

I too agree with Buddug.


Grok, why do you deliberately set out to confront in unhelpful ways, behaviour typified by the following comment?




"He was shouting at his child (she looks between 8-10). Hitting her on the back, and back of her head. Swearing and shouting she wasn't going to school. She was screaming every time he hit her and saying she wanted to go to school please Daddy.


Who doesnt have to raise voice to kids sometimes? Hitting or pushing along? Smacking, slapping, punching? Tantrum screaming like all kids can or crying out in pain? Swearing bloody, flipping or other?"




Most adults know the difference between acceptable chastisement and physical violence when they see it and no, neither my wife or I have ever felt the need to hit our children. The OP clearly reports abuse, the damage of which psychologically is well researched. The risks to hitting anyone in the head, let alone a child, are also well researched. But I shouldn't have to be pointing that out to you should I? Step back and think about what you are writing.

No one except Grok has said anything to suggest that what is reported in the OP is in any way okay. I think that needs to be made very clear before this turns in to a "I'm more worthy than you" competition.


And Grok is just Grok, so not really worth responding to.




But the point is that whether we have 5 pages of people saying how terrible this all is, or 5 pages of discussion about child abuse in different cultures, it makes ZERO difference to the child described in the OP.

If my posts are read you will see that child abuse is not condoned, and that the OP did the right thing for her by reporting to police.

Then the discussion moved on to rightly question why an unfounded allegation should be made public, why the OP accepted previous alleged child abuse and did nothing, together withOP racial and cultutal references where these allegedly played no part.

All of the OP post is still unfounded and there is no proof, and still could be something untrue and vindictive.


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No one except Grok has said anything to suggest

> that what is reported in the OP is in any way

> okay. I think that needs to be made very clear

> before this turns in to a "I'm more worthy than

> you" competition.

>

> And Grok is just Grok, so not really worth

> responding to.

>

>

>

> But the point is that whether we have 5 pages of

> people saying how terrible this all is, or 5 pages

> of discussion about child abuse in different

> cultures, it makes ZERO difference to the child

> described in the OP.

If there was something vindictive behind the thread and it was something personal, I think the OP would have made it more obvious exactly who they were talking about. I see nothing in the OP that suggests there was anything other than concern for a child behind it.
I can assure you had they been white yellow pink or green I would have done the same thing. I described their appearance to help find him and help this child. What a shame you even have to ask that question.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

>

> But the point is that whether we have 5 pages of

> people saying how terrible this all is, or 5 pages

> of discussion about child abuse in different

> cultures, it makes ZERO difference to the child

> described in the OP.


Welcome to the internet Otta

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...