Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The US has been pretty successful since the 70s. I might not remain preeminent but the its certainly had a long period off success.


Your question is either/or but economies work in cycles. the answer is "yes" to the first part and probably 'yes' to the second part. At some point in the future the dollar might well be backed by something more tangible.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8751-fiat-economy/#findComment-266550
Share on other sites

The US has been pretty successful since the 70s. I might not remain preeminent but the its certainly had a long period off success.


Your question is either/or but economies work in cycles. the answer is "yes" to the first part and probably 'yes' to the second part. At some point in the future the dollar might well be backed by something more tangible.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8751-fiat-economy/#findComment-266750
Share on other sites

any central bank will nowadays actively hedge its currency against a basket/ baskets of currencies - the individual currencies themselves may refer, to a greater or lesser extent, on a nominal or implied gold reference valuation


GB did indeed sell Gold, but remember at that time, Gold was an expensive asset to hold - producing little real return with its low lease rates and phenomenal storage costs. A move to a market based curreny stockpile was more indicitative and responsive to pressures and variables in the market


adopting a gold standard is dated and potentially risky - the web of derivatives that are used by corporates and governments make any valuation of a physical somewhat opaque


so yes. and no. and yes. and no.


bottom line, you cannot make a family meal of gold any more than you can from a wad of Euros


innit


bludz

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8751-fiat-economy/#findComment-266982
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • With the right type of feeder arrangement the access by parakeets, squirrels and rats can be eliminated completely. Likewise, the spread of disease can be minimised. The best method is to hang individual feeders inside a wire  cage that has a 2"x2" mesh on all sides that is mounted above ground. Being above ground it stops slugs and rats getting in. And with mesh on the bottom,the risk of transmitting disease from any droppings is eliminated. Small birds feel safe from predators in three These cages are available online for about £33
    • It is worthwhile noting that the original technical meaning was 'a reduction of 10%', which does not, to my mind, chime at all with 'drastically reduce'. I know that's how it is, I think lazily, often used nowadays but it does allow 'decimate' to be used so loosely that it loses meaning. And it can be confusing to those who know it's original meaning. I think that the fact that decimate and devastate are close homonyms does not help things here. 
    • Hi, I'm after a length of plastic or aluminium pipe, 40-50mm diameter and at least 600mm long. An unwanted offcut of plumbing soil pipe would be ideal. Many thanks!
    • But as language changes, it is no longer the "true" definition!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...