Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am thinking to start distilling spirits at home. Before investing in equipment I would be keen to talk with someone who has experience, so that I don't walk in blind. If anyone distills alcohol at home and is open to being asked some questions that would be very helpful, thanks.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/87966-home-alcohol-distiller/
Share on other sites

So hands up. As a chemistry undergraduate most of us tried it.


Pretty easy to get a pure product through double distillation.


And confirmed as such through gas chromatography.


But nobody would drink it, and with all the effort to brew the alcohol in the first place it wasn't worth the effort.


To do it properly, and get carry over of the other chemicals which give it taste is a skilled art.


Perhaps you could get a job where industrial quantities of illegal and probably quite dangerous liquor are produced.

Clnical distillation (ie that produces 97% or so alcohol) or freezing produces similar results. A super strength vodka. The only flavour is the alcohol which you then need to dilute and preferably add some flavour.


Various hooches can carry over methanol and other pretty horid higher alcohols, tasting nasty and possibly causing harm.


They add other stuff to meths, including the colour, to put you off drinking it and again this can be harmful.


The real stuff as said is an art to get the right flavours over - eg wood alcohols in Whisky and a complex cocktail in gin, from the juniper berries.


I read up alot about this when I was going through the motions. I even bought a bag of maize, ground it down and maleted it. A failure! As I said rights of passage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...