Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sadly our flat on lordship lane was burgled over Christmas and they stole all of my jewellery- most not expensive but a few very special and sentimental items that have left me gutted. Should anyone by any chance see or find any of the following items in pawn shops or around please please let me know. Thank you.



- gold religious pendant symbol necklace with the image of Mary and a smaller blue pendant from Lourdea-(belonged to my aunty who passed away)


- a gold diamond and sapphire trilogy ring


- a van cleef and arpels gold and mother of pearl long necklace


- a gold dkny watch


- a silver D & G watch


Also stolen.. A black kindle with a ted baker black cover and a Bose travel speaker with a pink cover

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/88276-stolen-jewellery/
Share on other sites

Very sorry to hear about your burglary.


It happened to my next door neighbour on Christmas Eve and lots more neighbours over the past months and couple of years.


Some of them were elderly and they were left feeling very vulnerable (I know I felt the same living next door).


Burglary and car crime seems on the up I'm afraid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...