Jump to content

Our wonderful nanny available from Feb


Recommended Posts

We have a wonderful nanny, who has been with our family for almost 2 years, that we sadly no longer need as of the beginning of February.


In her time with us she has been responsible for our son and daughter who are now 2yrs and 4yrs. She is very active, filling days with play groups, play dates, swimming, classes etc., and has managed a temporary share with another child as well as doing school drop offs and pick ups.


Our children love her and throughout her time with us she has been incredibly reliable. We are more than happy to provide glowing references.


Please be in touch if you are interested.


Many thanks

lucy

Hi Lucy,


We're looking for a nanny to start in April for our daughter who will be 11 months old then. We're looking for 3 days a week (Tue, Wed and Fri). We're based in Honor Oak Park.

If your nanny is interested, I can be contacted on 07722683840.


Thanks,

Michelle

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...