Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi we got a PCN from TFL as our car slipped into the box junction, pictures show us going in and waiting with tail half in the box. We challenged this as there are two box junctions positioned close together between sets of traffic lights outside the Peckham bus garage, but moreover the fact that they are there not to help filter traffic but actually causes problems and for accummulating revenue for the TFL, e.g there is no real right hand turn, the traffic lights are between each box change so increases chance of being caught in them, therefore they are not appropriately placed. We have a hearing tomorrow but wondering if anyone else has had experience of successfully appealing or being fined for going into the boxes. There seems to be ample room for the buses to enter the garage and I do not know why they don't just have a keep clear sign in place or just wait a few minutes like other vehicles, why do buses have special priority? Failing that I was going to challenge them on the amount ?130 which is disproportionate to the offence?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/89142-box-junction-appealschallenges/
Share on other sites

You won't win by saying it's unfair and money making or the fine is too big. You might win if you appeal based on law.


Box junction law is complex. There are a couple of websites out there that cover most of the bases -


http://www.appealnow.com/parking-tickets/yellow-box-junctions/

http://yellowboxjunction.co.uk

https://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/


They will give you a good idea on how you might appeal. It's mostly around the fact that the offence occurs when you enter the box, so at that point do you have any clear exit to the box.


A user here called fredricketts I think successfully appealed on a yellow box ticket here. He's not been active here for a couple of years, but sending him an email might work. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,135592,708635#msg-708635


In the case of the bus station yellow box, I suspect (but I don't think this has ever been proven) that it is an illegal box junction. A box junction has the be at the junction of two roads - this is at the junction of a road and a bus garage. It would all depend on whether that entrance to the bus station is legally a road.

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The way I understand box junctions, if you enter

> it with the expectation that the traffic ahead of

> you will move and thus make space for you, you can

> appeal it. As Loz says above, the offence occurs

> when you enter the marked area, not once you are

> in it.


That's wrong. You're not allowed to stop in a yellow box (unless turning right). The only way to do that is if you can see enough space on the other side.


The whole point of a yellow box is to keep a clear area, which is also why you find them outside fire station and ambulance depots.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a bus station, not a garage; so it is a road

> (restricted to buses, so don't go driving there

> either or they'll fine you!)


The Road Traffic Act 1988 defines a ?road? as "in relation to England and Wales, means any highway and any other road to which the public has access, and includes bridges over which a road passes".


I reckon it worth a try as a part of an argument.

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The way I understand box junctions, if you enter it with the expectation that the traffic ahead of

> you will move and thus make space for you, you can appeal it. As Loz says above, the offence occurs

> when you enter the marked area, not once you are in it.


Not quite. If there is a space to exit when you enter, you have a good chance of appeal. So, if someone cuts you up, then you have a good excuse. But if you enter hoping the exit will clear, you won't have much success in appealing.


Bizarrely, on two lane roads, if the other lane is clear and you stop, people have successfully appealed as they were considered to have chosen to stop, rather than were forced to stop (as per the letter of the law)!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a bus station, not a garage; so it is a

> road

> > (restricted to buses, so don't go driving there

> > either or they'll fine you!)

>

> The Road Traffic Act 1988 defines a ?road? as "in

> relation to England and Wales, means any highway

> and any other road to which the public has access,

> and includes bridges over which a road passes".

>

> I reckon it worth a try as a part of an argument.



I see your point. But would you employ the same argument if it were a fire station / ambulance station?

I dont think we can rely on arguing against the fact we did enter and stop in the box although momentarily and partially. Hoping more to argue on the position, purpose therefore validity or legality of the box junctions. Tfl argue that they sought consultation through proper channels. Meaningless to me as its proof of functionality thats important, confusion to public, inadequate traffic management and only serving purpose of lining their purses increaing their revenue is worth challenging. Have checked some of the sites suggested by Loz and tips like what constitutes a road is useful to know. Thanks. The point of whether it would be same argument for an ambulance or firestation is irrelevant as its not, its outside a bus station/garage operated by TFL.
12.9 Yellow box markings may be used outsidepolice, fire, ambulance stations or hospitals only where there is an access road forming a junction with the main road. Where vehicles exit directly onto the carriageway, a KEEP CLEAR marking to diagram1026 or a KEEP CLEAR marking to diagram1027.1 (varied to omit the word ?SCHOOL?) shouldbe usedd.
Good point nashoi and worth noting.TFL objected to our challenge sending a CD of recording our vehicle along with a catalogue of papers defending their position aggressively advising us to pay the now increased charge of ?130. We have tribunal hearing tomorrow for our case to be heard. Therefore useful to arm ourselves with information for our defence.
Attended hearing today and lost. Made our representation with info gathered. His response was basically a contravention has occurred heres the fine to pay. Regarding the box junction rules he said verbatim the authorities can do what they like and put box junction where they like, that cant be used as a defence. I suggest that the location of them results in problems fines profitting TFL which therefore should be removed maybe local MP would like to take up the cause. Disappointed to say the least lost faith in system completely bolstering fat cats.

I kinda have some sympathy as I've been caught out in the same place. It doesn't help that the flow of traffic through there is so volatile, and people seem to drive quite aggressively.


Nevertheless, sounds like you were at fault and to be honest I'm not surprised your appeal was rejected. "Bolstering fat cats?" Who are the fat cats? ?130 might sound like a lot, but doesn't go very far when you think about the whole process of enforcement, issuing fines, appeal, hearing, etc.

The hearing was at London Tribunals. Fat cats i refer to TFL. If they didnt have box junctions in such places to catch people there would be less PCNs and subsequent hearings. Accepted we were caught in the box no doubt about that but the man (judge?)supporting authorities stating they can do what they like and put box junction where they like i didnt accept and i queried thd legality of this. He declined to comment on this.

Here's a freedom of Information request made by a person remarked on above back in 2010


https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/yellow_box_junction_size


I noted


"A total of 3,048 PCNs were issued in the Peckham/High St/Peckham Bus

station for contraventions between 5 January 2010 until 21 August 2010."

You can still appeal the adjudicators decision if, as it seems in this case according to what you say, "the interests of justice require a review" as he/she has ignored the requirements under the Road Traffic Act.


http://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/ruc/your-hearing/making-application-review-adjudicators-decision

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was open yesterday evening (Saturday) and fairly busy, too.
    • Has she been out before?  Bengals love to explore and have a high prey drive.  Put her litter tray and bed outside which may help her to find her way home.
    • Hello I have been with EE for years -10 ? - never had a single outage which is great when WFH. I had virgin before and it was terrible - so many outages - I live on Whateley Road - hope this is helpful 
    • This may be somewhat out of date but virtually no environmental benefit & almost entirely grass... really? https://www.gigl.org.uk/sinc/sobi09/ Description Peckham Rye was established as an open space in the late 19th century and includes several valuable habitat features spread across the park. The park is a Grade II Listed landscape, and has recently been restored with assistance from the Heritage Lottery Fund. A small community garden within the site is managed by the Friends of Peckham Rye. Peckham Rye Park won a Green Flag Award again for 2022. The site is used by the Southwark Health Walks project as part of a Walking the Way to Health (WHI) scheme. Wildlife This large park has several valuable habitat features. The most important of these is the only remaining above-ground section of the River Peck and the most natural stream in the borough. The stream is heavily shaded by native, unmanaged wet woodland dominated by alder, ash and pedunculated oak with a ground cover of pendulous sedge and bramble. Alder dominated woodland is a rare habitat in Southwark. Although somewhat altered with weirs, other artificial structures and ornamental planting, some sections are still in their natural banks and includes yellow flag, watercress, water figwort and cuckooflower. The largest of three ponds supports marginal vegetation including hemp agrimony. A variety of waterfowl nest on the wooded island, including tufted duck, coot, Canada goose and mallard. Substantial flocks of gulls visit the park in winter and bats are likely to forage over the water. Small blocks of predominantly native woodland, mostly on the boundary between the Park and the Common, are dominated by oak and ash with a well-developed understory, but sparse ground flora. Spring bulbs have been planted in previous years. These and several dense shrubberies support a good bird population and small numbers of pipistrelle bats are present. Infrequently mown grassland is located in one large area and was seeded in 2009. It's composition includes giant fescue, ladies bedstraw, meadowsweet, black knapweed and wild carrot. The rest of the park consists of amenity grassland with some fine mature trees.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...