Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was on Sky HD tonight. Wonderful programme. What

> an achievement.

>

> Beating Argentina and then Portugal was fantastic.

> Bobby Charlton and Bobby Moore were the heroes but

> Stiles was good enough to police Eusebio into

> submission in the SF.


Is police another term for kicking?

I was 8 when the 66 world cup was played and watched some of the games and I recall the Argentine captain Rattin being sent off and Alf Ramsey wouldn't allow the English players to exchange shirts as he called them "Animals" or words to that effect because of the nasty tactics used by the Argentinian side during that game. How times have changed eh?

I was also eight years old at the time. I'd been packed off to a relatives for a week because my mum was about to give birth to my younger brother who was born the day before we won the World Cup at Dulwich Hospital.

I watched the game at my cousin's grandmother's house in Hatfield. I remember being absolutely gutted that my hero Jimmy Greaves wasn't playing and kept looking out for him behind Sir Alf the trainer Harold Sheperdson on the bench. Assuming I don't get Alzheimer's it's a day I'll never forget.

I heard a debate on radio 5 last night about whether we should be honouring these players. I would certainly say yes - its a long tome ago but the gap and low achievements since then has made the achievements all the more poignant.


The home advantage thing is trotted out many times but it was pointed out in this programme that at the time, recent hosts had not fared well.

Favourites and best team in 70


Was the taking off of Bobby Charlton when the match was won 2-0 the catalyst for defeat?


Some shaky defending as the match progressed, soft goal back, but if Hurst had either a finer or thicker touch when he beat the onrushing goalie with a header that would have been all over at 3-1.


A hoof was all that was needed to clear before the equaliser. And then Labone should have finished it off for England in extra time with a free shot from a corner.


Played at a snails pace, and not helped by the Mexican crowd that were clearly supporting Germany.


Ah, what might have been.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Favourites and best team in 70

>

> Was the taking off of Bobby Charlton when the

> match was won 2-0 the catalyst for defeat?

>


I have always thought that was a common misconception - Charlton was actually subbed immediately after the first Germany goal - probably as a direct result of the goal, which included Beckenbauer strolling through the midfield to score. see link for stats


http://www.planetworldcup.com/CUPS/1970/qf_ger_v_eng.html

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was in Rome for the Brazil game, my dad took me to

> the Hotel bar to watch it on a minute black and

> white TV with all the Italians supporting Brazil

> and one Canadian with us :)


This was my first memory of watching a match on TV, sat on the arm of my Dad's chair. It must've been a special occasion, he wore a shirt and tie :)


> Cried after the West Germany game :(


Me too. But 5 mins later I was outside in the road with my mates trying to replicate Muller's 'over the shoulder' goal :)...

I think musically and youth culturally people who hit there teenager years in the late 50s or early in the 6Os AND those that hit them in the early 70s are quite lucky. The first lot had all the excitement of the 6os; we had all the rejecting the 6os changes (and yes Bowie was VERY important)all the tribalism (which was great then), punk obviously, but were also young enough (just) for the Acieeed House explosion - which actually change things the most in my opinion. Funnily enough I always feel a bit sorry for the people who are about ten years older than me a bit too young for the proper 60s and the proper hippy stuff and then a bit too old for punk :)


Otta, you're an honorary us...apart from the rock thing :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...