Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently went to a fish and chip shop in the West Country which had been heavily recommended on Trip Advisor, in fact it had exclusively positive reviews. On arrival the elderly owner was keen to shove people through the conveyor belt process by handing you the menu whilst waiting close to the door. Then demanding your order within moments of taking your seat. The restaurant was busy, and it was towards the end of the summer season. The chips were anaemic on arrival and they even charged you for sauces (which is a real annoyance of mine). My question is, how heavily can we rely on Trip Advisor for providing honest and fair reviews? Are there processes in place to monitor who is reviewing for example? I mean it could well be certain businesses are giving themselves positive reviews to entice customers. What does everyone think?


Louisa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/90140-trip-advisor-good-or-bad/
Share on other sites

Simply put your review in to get some balance

I always look at the high and low scores.

It has been very helpful to me in getting mid range accommodation

I am aware of concerted efforts by businesses to falsify reviews but never seen it in the places I have stayed.

I was conscious in Morocco over Xmas that virtually every restaurant had a Tripadvisor sticker on the door. Well it is better than the Lonely Planet when we used to backpack and every traveler getting off the train would rush to the recommended hostels, guest houses and restaurants which could put their prices up accordingly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...