Jump to content

Little Clipper - Intoxicated Stylist


davidhealy

Recommended Posts

Today I took my son to the Little Clipper to get his hair cut. I was appalled and shocked to find that the stylist cutting my two year old's hair was intoxicated and smelt heavily of alcohol. The Manager arrived to deal with the issue but by this point said stylist had already cut several children's/infants hair. No parent should ever be put in this sort of position as this is at best outrageous and at worst dangerous.


I can assure you we will not be returning. I would urge other ED customers to exercise caution.

In case the OP is removed again, this is what it says, as I did not use the "quote" button:


"Today I took my son to the Little Clipper to get his hair cut. I was appalled and shocked to find that the stylist cutting my two year old's hair was intoxicated and smelt heavily of alcohol. The Manager arrived to deal with the issue but by this point said stylist had already cut several children's/infants hair. No parent should ever be put in this sort of position as this is at best outrageous and at worst dangerous.


I can assure you we will not be returning. I would urge other ED customers to exercise caution."



I had answered your previous longer post where you said (if memory serves) that this stylist had turned up late and drunk, that the manager was not in the salon at the time and had to be phoned by another stylist who had been working alone up until then, and that you had not paid for the cut.


However, both your post and my post disappeared as I was posting mine.


It's hardly the manager's fault if an employee turns up drunk, unless it had happened before, so I think it's a bit harsh to boycott the place, as surely this person won't be kept on?


What I can't really understand is why you would let a drunk person start/continue to cut your child's hair if you thought it was dangerous, and it bothered you enough that you then posted on here to warn others?


Have I misunderstood?

tallulah71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the stylist was that obviously "intoxicated"

> surely the other members of staff would have

> noticed, too. Agree with Sue - if it was that

> obvious, it was your responsibility to halt it.



According to the previous longer post by the OP which was removed, there was one other stylist working alone in the salon at the time when the stylist complained of turned up late and drunk.


The other stylist - presumably not knowing what action to take, and who can blame them - phoned the manager, who then came down to deal with the matter.


What happened then we were not told, except that the OP did not have to pay for his child's cut (so he evidently let the cut start and continue, whilst knowing the stylist was drunk, but then did not pay for it and posted on here to say how dangerous it was).


If memory serves he also dissed the other parents present for not doing anything about the situation, although he did not say that he had done anything about it either, apart from refusing to pay (or possibly the manager said that of course he would not have to pay, how do we know?).


Perhaps he would like to come on here again and let us have the full story.

The manager appears to have dealt with this quickly and firmly. He has sacked the individual involved, apologised and refunded customers. They could not have done more imo and their response is admirable. People certainly should not be put off from visiting in future.

davidhealy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Sue you will find I replied directly to

> the message from Little Clipper



OK, haven't seen it


ETA: Have now. I just thought you might have responded to some of the comments on this thread, but never mind.

tallulah71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the stylist was that obviously "intoxicated"

> surely the other members of staff would have

> noticed, too. Agree with Sue - if it was that

> obvious, it was your responsibility to halt it.



Challenging a drunk person who is holding a pair of scissors.....tricky.


I'm wondering how "drunk" this person was:


Was this first thing in the morning? as in smelling of drink from the night before (which some people would define as drunk)

Later in the day but had had a drink at lunchtime

Later in the day and obviously had had quite a few drinks ....


none of the above are ok to be in charge of a pair of scissors but just trying to picture the scene.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tallulah71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If the stylist was that obviously "intoxicated"

> > surely the other members of staff would have

> > noticed, too. Agree with Sue - if it was that

> > obvious, it was your responsibility to halt it.

>

>

> Challenging a drunk person who is holding a pair

> of scissors.....tricky.

>

> I'm wondering how "drunk" this person was:

>

> Was this first thing in the morning? as in

> smelling of drink from the night before (which

> some people would define as drunk)

> Later in the day but had had a drink at lunchtime

>

> Later in the day and obviously had had quite a few

> drinks ....

>

> none of the above are ok to be in charge of a pair

> of scissors but just trying to picture the scene.


So dodgy as different people are effected differently

especially the day after (although I assume they would

all have the same level of alcohol in the blood).


After an Xmas party you see some people who can't function

the day after - whilst some look like perky as ever.


Smelling is about showering/deodorant and clean clothes IMHO.

no excuse unless theres a medical problem.

I'd be a bit upset if someone handling a tool like scissors around my kid was coming across as under the influence (of anything). I'd sort it straight away though, not wait for someone (anyone) to come along and take care of the situation. It's your kid and you gotta look after your kid.

Can't see how the establishment / mgt can be held to account, unless the staff member had been helping themselves to the staff beers chilling in the staff barrel of ice by the staff area.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Can't see how the establishment / mgt can be held

> to account, unless the staff member had been

> helping themselves to the staff beers chilling in

> the staff barrel of ice by the staff area.



No, exactly.


It's clear from the post by the Little Clipper manager on the other thread that it was sorted immediately and the staff member was sacked.


The only way the manager could be held accountable, surely, is if it had happened before and the staff member had been kept on? Which surely would be unlikely in the extreme?


Mmmm, staff drinks. I was a manager (not of a hair salon, obv) in the days when you got a personal drinks cupboard :)) with a selection of spirits etc to offer visitors :))


And it wasn't unusual to go into a colleague's office (in those days you got a separate office too) after lunch and find them, let's say, not capable of working having been out on the razz at lunchtime.


How times have (mostly) changed. Looking back, it's amazing how anything ever got done :))


Ooops, sorry, just realised this isn't in the lounge, sorry admin.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...