Jump to content

Music Techies - Wireless Active Speakers - Logitech


Recommended Posts

I recently bought a new laptop - Dell Inspiron? I am very disappointed with both the sound quality and volume. Have played around with the internal settings to no avail.


Someone suggested stand alone speakers and I have progressed to the concept of wireless speakers, that operate from a bluetooth dongle, which comes supplied with the speakers.


My question is that when buying speakers I used to look for wattage as a guide to good sound quality being maintained at higher volumes - the speakers I am looking at are "active" speakers, is this the reason there is no wattage quoted? and could the poor volume level from my laptop be translated to the speakers, thus limiting their output?


Reviews suggest these speakers produce good quailty sound, but want to be sure they produce decent volume, otherwise I'm back to square one.


Words of wisdom would be helpful. Thanks.


Logitech Speakers

'Active' just means they have a built-in amplifier.


Wattage is no real indication of volume.


Neither are any indication of quality sound.



However, most add-on (even crappy ones) will be better than your laptop sound.


If you really want to get 'good sound' (and portability of sound system isn't an issue) why not capitalise on what you already own and spend the cash on a bluetooth receiver that plugs into your existing hi-fi?

Apologies if this is too low-tech a solution, but I don't even bother with bluetooth. I have a long audio cable going from the headphone sockets to the AUX in a nearby amp/stereo


Cost = about the same as a pint

Quality = leagues better than any standalone speakers


Cons = well, there is a cable knocking around. But as I don't move the laptop that much, the cable is hidden behind trunking and shelves

Amazingly we don't have a decent existing hi fi.


My wife would like one for christmas, but even then it would be in a different room from where I normally use the computer (in the kitchen).


Before I buy these speakers how would I know they produce decent volume - I guess I need to take it on trust?

Thanks Sean - but yes I was hoping to keep it cable free in the kitchen, but will revert to that if speakers don't operate properly.


In any event an mp3 cable comes with the speakers for direct plug in if needed, and can do same for lap top if bluetooth does not work out.


Thanks.

Generally any n.1 (ie with a subwoofer) system will give you decent enough volume, though the quality will not be hifi quality if music is your main thing, but if it's mostly iplayer and games it'll be grand.


I can also see the attraction of wireless on a surround type system as the wires do get everywhere.

I've a little 2.1 thing that cost about 40 quid for my pc upstairs and does the job absolutely fine.

Well all is relative, isn't it?


If you're expecting something great, you'll be disappointed.

If you're expecting something terrible, you might be pleasantly surprised.


My suggestion would be to forget about wireless and get something like a Tivoli PAL, which I really rate, and just plug it in with a short minijack connector.


Great mono sound (stereo is for pansies) quality with decent volume.

Battery will last you all day if no mains connection is available.

Small enough to carry around.

Also a very good *proper* analogue radio tuner.


GREAT product.


file.php?20,file=7752

Certainly not!


Jez, I'm sure you favour highly polished boxes with five thousand multi-coloured flashing LEDS, wireless capability, a remote control and six adjacent speakers for optimal, er, stereo sound - all for under a ?100.


I rather my money went mostly on the components inside the case.

How about this one Jeremy?!


It's got blue LEDs and alien-style lettering, so it ought to be good. And it's a funny shape which is also important when it comes to sound. It's got 8-channel wireless capability, one of which might not even buzz like an angry bee when the microwave is on. Best of all, you can chain loads of them together, so you can listen to horrible sound in every room! (As long as you don't have walls or the like dividing your rooms, obviously).


file.php?20,file=7753

Here you go mick, these are quite funky and unobtrusive.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/JBL-Spot-2-1-Speakers-Interchangeable/dp/B000KVRBS8/ref=sr_1_28?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1260286191&sr=1-28


Ignore bob's funky minimalism for those who mono their radios.


If you want pricey quality minimalism get one of these

http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/musicalfidelity_a32.htm

I did look at your suggestion Mockney - the salt and pepper pots looked good but with wires and I'm going to experiment with the no wires version to see how it goes.


Bobs wireless ones were good too but were ?44 each and tiny and when they start saying you can use up to 40 at once without interference I could see the cost mounting up.....

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Bobs wireless ones were good too

>

> (*closes eyes and slaps forehead*)



Lol - If they were not so small Bob I was seriously considering them. Honest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...