Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just heard about this:


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6956044.ece


Bloke gets burgled then chases and catches and beats the guy who threatened his family, gets jailed for his efforts.


Come on !


Liberals out you come, let's hear it, 'appropriate level of restraint' etc etc.

That and inflicting brain damage


I've been burgled and have been enraged - and if something happened in the house in self defence I have more sympathy.


But you stop being a victim when you enlist others to hit the streets and disbale people

The law is pretty clear on this. He broke he law by taking into his own hands.

For the level of violence shown I think he got off pretty lightly and I'm sure his being a law abiding family man was taken into account.

He'll be out by next march.

Basically, what PGC and Sean said. That is not "bleeding heart liberal", it's just not being a psycho.


I support his right to chase them, I understand, and pretty much support him wanting to give them a dig, but smashing a solid wooden bat over someone's skull, that is a bit mentalist in my book.

I?m inclined to say that if someone decides to invade someone else?s home and ends up brain damaged (or crippled or dead for that matter) for their efforts. Well diddums, they shouldn?t have broken into someone?s house then.


But the law is the law and the precedent for this sort of thing is pretty well established.

The intruders sound like a particularly nasty bunch, and frankly I have zero sympathy for him. If you threaten to kill someone, you shouldn't be surprised if you get a beating in response.


Saying that, by beating the guy sensless, they obviously went too far and should have known they'd get in trouble.

If he'd chased him, knocked him down, given him a kick for good measure, and sat on him until the cops arrived, I'd say well done, and I strongly suspect the cops would have done the same. He went way too far, however. I do think the sentence is on the long side tho'.

the copper and CPS will accept a light kicking doled out if it can be explained as required in apprehending someone who burgles your place & thretens to kill your family


setting about someone with bats & bars isnt reasonable force


The Intent charge is crucial here - i.e. they set out to cause injury to the Burglar.

Quite DaveR. Indont think the burglars will get much sympathy from anyone, but it's one thing to be threatening and another to do harm. As it goes they scared the bejeezus out of a family but ended up with brain damage. That's a life sentence to the other guy's 30 months.


An old patient of my mums was a chap who burgled a jewellers. The store owner shot him in the head with a shotgun causing brain damage with particular issues with his speech (hence seeing my mum).

The store owner was held as a hero in the letters pave of the local press, but in the end (once chap came out of coma) it turned out they knew each other, it was an insurance job and store owner had felt that killin the paid for burglar was the only way of ensuring he wasn't found out. Down he went for many years.


Now I'm not saying this is the case, but we really dont know what went on. And it reall was a life sentence for the chap who certainly had 'hangings too good for him' said about him. I don't recall the subsequent derails ever hitting the press, it was only because he was a patient tha we got to find it all out.

Spot on DaveR!


If this had been in the house, and he'd managed to grab the bat, and took a swing at the intruder in order to possibly save his and his families lives, that would be completely understandable. However, he picked up the bat, and set off with it as a weapon.


I don't have sympathy with the intruders, but my sympathy for this bloke is limited because he went WAY too far!


Anyone who thinks he didn't, try smashing a cricket bat against a brick wall, and see how easily it breaks.

Anyone here had a knife held to their and their families throats by blokes in balaclavas waiting for them in their own home

....of course it's wrong but I have a great deal of sympathy and some empathy with them, far more than the farmer bloke.




Now....where's that thread about the bloke who spat in Keef's face? :-S

so easy to be miles from the situation at hand and say what someone should do when they have just a couple of minutes earlier been scared to death for their own and their families lives, thinking that any moment their own lives could be ended. can you even imagine being scared your kids are going to be killed or hurt by a stranger who means harm and says he means harm.


yes the law is very clear and well done for pinting it out, try following it when you are in that situation inches from losing your life.


If I had the guts that guy had I am sure I would also be getting 30 months.

suspended sentence the burglar gets ! let's rehabilitate the guy, give me a break.

well, suspended sentence and brain damage


"so easy to be miles from the situation at hand and say what someone should do when they have just a couple of minutes earlier been scared to death "


Well that is both true and one of the reasons we live in a civilization and not some wild west hell hole

I don't think he'll be doing much as he's severly braindamaged. I don't have any sympathy for the guy, though. If you enter someone's house, tie them, their wife and kids up and hold a knife to their throat, then that persons brother and friends turn up chasing you away and then catch you, then what do you expect.

As Piers said, I don't think anyone has sympathy for burglars - this one or any other


But it's just not correct to say he got away with anything, or even got off lightly. The homeowner has his own idea of what justice should be and has dished it out - so he can't complain either

so easy to be miles from the situation at hand and say what someone should do when they have just a couple of minutes earlier been scared to death for their own and their families lives, thinking that any moment their own lives could be ended. can you even imagine being scared your kids are going to be killed or hurt by a stranger who means harm and says he means harm.


I think this is the whole point though. As I said before, had he gotten hold of the bat, DURING the horrible situation in the house, then it would be totally excusable. However, rather than calling the police, and being with his family, the bloke went mental and smashed a person's head in with a bloody cricket bat, I mean, come on!


Yes I feel sorry for the guy, and I don't know what I'd do in that situation (neither does ANYONE on here), but I like to think, if I went after someone, I'd give them a dig, not brain damage.


I love the following comment at the end of the article.


So the courts are more interested in 'law' than 'justice'.


Well, er, yeah.


I fucking hate the way the word "Justice" is thrown about in this country by idiots.


Oh and Quids, I'd love to get hold of the kid who spat in my face, and yes, I'd love to slap him about a bit if I'm honest. I don't want to do lasting damage, or kill him.

I love the wail the daily mail *spits* take some sort of personal affront at stories like this.

And who on earth mentioned rehabilitation, though doubtless years of expensive physio/speech therapy to ensue for one.


My bottom line is burglar got commeuppance. He didn't get justice (except insofar as the other guy has been put away.

Your vigilante also got his just desserts. Though difficult to know how I'd react* my first concern would be for my family not taking a bat to someone. His actions, however you view them were premeditated and against the law.


Seems to me a case of law done good all round under difficult circumstances frankly.


For the record I have awoken to balaclavaed robber in my flat in the middle of the night though whether armed or not he didn't threaten me. The first thing i did was call the police.

The state should also deliver some sort of justice to the wronged.....and too often it doesn't, so our justice system is also cupable to some extent. Would this guy have got what he deserved in the courts? Who knows but my suspicion is no. 50 previous convictions suggest that the legal system had failed at least 49 other true victims.


Again, it's not right.... but the assumption that the state consistently delivers 'justice' or punishment for this sort of crime has its flaws. My sympathy is almost entirely with the guy whose private house was invaded and family threatened with death (this is not a 'burgalry' BTW)and I have very little for the whacked one... that's my honest feeling on this not my.....I'm struggling not to use the 'L' word 'stance'. Criminals as victims, sob, sob...I tend to sh!t on that view.....


edited to 50 for %0

I would have beat the burglar senseles and gone to prison I am afraid, the man and his family went through a terrifying and humiliating expeirience, at the point you break in and threaten my famiuly with death you get whats coming to you, simples.

iaineasy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would have beat the burglar senseles and gone to

> prison I am afraid, the man and his family went

> through a terrifying and humiliating expeirience,

> at the point you break in and threaten my famiuly

> with death you get whats coming to you, simples.


No "Hugs" then? ;-)


I'm struggling not to use the 'L' word 'stance'. Criminals as victims, sob, sob...I tend to sh!t on that view.....


I don't think anyone on this thread has been soft or liberal about this, and noone has shown sympathy for the twat who got beat up. People have just said that he went too far.


I can't stand all this "if someone done that to me, I'd fecking 'av 'em", because frankly it's macho bollix, which I suspect would never be backed up, and hopefully the situation will never arise!

I recall a lawyer friend once telling me that its better to kill a burglar than seriously injure them them as dead people don't make as good a prosecution witness as live people and they cant disagree with your version of events.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...