Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Absolutely exactly what they said they didn't want...but England aren't there for second place, you want to win you've got to beat them all! I'd say the biggest worry is having to play the Pumas, not so much for the result as how much injury damage they could do, especially up front - also it looks like either Samoa or Tonga will fill out the group, same applies. Hopefully when they draw up the fixtures one of those matches could be the last with England already qualified so some key players could be rested.


I'm thinking Messrs Mick Mac and Medic must be pleased!

World Cup 2007, we had that same group, with France and Argentina. We got dumped out.


As the best team in the world, or thereabouts, England should have no problems of course.


I'd say Ireland will be happy yes, avoiding all three southern hemisphere teams.


Quite nice that NZ and SA are in the same group, to batter sevens shades of sh1t out of each other early doors.

The thing is that 2 years is a long time in international rugby. So its pretty hard to know what the teams will be like (with the exception of the All Blacks, who will no doubt have at least 3 new 'wunderkids' who we havent even heard of today yet).


Just imagine if these were the pools based on 2015 RWC form (i.e. only 2 years ago)....

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well you you were never going to get NZ or Aus,

> being in Band 1, but still a pretty nice draw.

>

> We are the second best team in the world, the

> numbers say so so it must be true...the fact that

> in our last match we lost to No.4...


Awww, bless.

I'm sad to report Cyprus lost in the last 5 minutes against Croatia. Relegated a tier in Division 3 Europe South. They will bounce back.


I see The Cherrytree is showing Lions Games. I'm around for 1st Test. Second Test in Scotland for my nieces wedding. The entire local 1st 15 and possibly some internationals are going(unless called up for Lions) my niece is worried for her wedding day....

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolutely exactly what they said they didn't

> want...but England aren't there for second place,

> you want to win you've got to beat them all! I'd

> say the biggest worry is having to play the Pumas,

> not so much for the result as how much injury

> damage they could do, especially up front - also

> it looks like either Samoa or Tonga will fill out

> the group, same applies. Hopefully when they draw

> up the fixtures one of those matches could be the

> last with England already qualified so some key

> players could be rested.

>

> I'm thinking Messrs Mick Mac and Medic must be

> pleased!


Yes, agree Rendel. It's not just the quality of the opposition it's the physical nature of those teams and encounters which will stretch England and disadvantage them in the KO stages (if they get there, unlike last time :)).

  • 5 weeks later...

From the above team I reckon 1/2penny should be in. Good defensively and top goalkicker. Watson to the wing along with Daly. No place for North or Williams.Itoje with Kruis in the 2nd row. George as hooker.


Will Gatland include Sexton? I'd like to see that with Farrell in the centre with Davies. That's 5 changes from the above team I think.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only thing about Rory Best which has probably

> cost him a place is that his line out throwing

> sometimes lets him down.


Agreed. I don't think he'll be in the test team. Also agree on Williams, s/be omitted.

Great match. Well the 1st fifty minutes anyway. I thought the Lions were less than equal in the forwards so any changes may come there for the 2nd test. I don't think AWJ will be selected ahead of MI. I can see Henderson making the 23 at least. I also suspect Best is in with a chance as Stephen Ferris brought up on the TV. Maybe SW will be picked ahead of POM.


Any thoughts on changes?

Well, I was dead wrong about Williams, he played a blinder. I'd want Best to start, and maybe Cole - he's not that creative but he's solid as a rock. Itoje on the pitch from the start...Joseph in the centres? Warburton from the start as well maybe, I think he's better as a solid starter than an "impact" sub. Other than that, you know, they did a pretty good job really, just outclassed by the best team on the planet by a good couple of furlongs.
Hard to grasp Gatland bringing in these Welsh/Scots for the mid-week games and then not using them. If he couldn't foresee the negative reaction it would cause someone should have told him. As it is he made things worse by only using them if he had to, and flogging to death some players by playing them for 80 minutes a few days before a test match. At least he took Lawes off but Henderson on that form should at least be in the 23.
Agree, totally idiotic - he makes a big thing of not being bothered by pressure but clearly some old farts in blazers have had a word about "respecting the shirt, old boy..." If someone who wouldn't otherwise have done gets to play a half for the Lions, does it really matter, and if it saves players for the tests...ridiculous fuss, it made sense to call up players who had short journeys (especially when we saw how jetlagged the Lions looked at the start of the tour) and it's not as if they were called out of the local pub team - all established internationals. Cole and Marler, to name but two, looked absolutely shagged by the end of yesterday's thriller; now if a prop or two gets crocked in training before Saturday Gatland'll have to think about putting poorly recovered players in the 23, all because of some myth about "respecting the shirt."

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hard to grasp Gatland bringing in these

> Welsh/Scots for the mid-week games and then not

> using them. If he couldn't foresee the negative

> reaction it would cause someone should have told

> him. As it is he made things worse by only using

> them if he had to, and flogging to death some

> players by playing them for 80 minutes a few days

> before a test match. At least he took Lawes off

> but Henderson on that form should at least be in

> the 23.


He said at the beginning of the tour "the Wales squad

is nearby" and I guessed how it would pan out.


The 4 Welsh guys have not played and have no Lions number

I think both Scottish guys have a number as they did a

few minutes.


Edit: I think however the Welsh 4 knew what was what.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, I was dead wrong about Williams, he played a

> blinder.


Disagree to an extent.


For all the brilliance of starting the move for that amazing try, and some other breaks shared with Watson, Williams was poor under the high ball from start to finish, and has been throughout the tour. I still think he shouldn't be playing.


Specifically he missed the simple catch that lead to the NZ second half try, the one that killed the game. We are missing Rob Kearney and arguably Mike Brown under the high ball. Without an effective high ball catcher, Conor Murray's box kicks are handing over possession to the ABs, chasing those seemed to be William's job last Saturday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...