Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree I guess, maybe I was a bit dazzled by his exceeding my expectations for him, which were very low. Bit left-field but is it worth considering Jack Nowell at 15? For me he simply hasn't the pace for a top-class wing, but he can catch, tackle and is an excellent counter-attacking runner in broken field play. He's played fullback for the Chiefs on occasion.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well, I was dead wrong about Williams, he played

> a

> > blinder.

>

> Disagree to an extent.

>

> For all the brilliance of starting the move for

> that amazing try, and some other breaks shared

> with Watson, Williams was poor under the high ball

> from start to finish, and has been throughout the

> tour. I still think he shouldn't be playing.

>

> Specifically he missed the simple catch that lead

> to the NZ second half try, the one that killed the

> game. We are missing Rob Kearney and arguably Mike

> Brown under the high ball. Without an effective

> high ball catcher, Conor Murray's box kicks are

> handing over possession to the ABs, chasing those

> seemed to be William's job last Saturday.


Apparently he took a knock just before that (and had on a huge bandage

around his head (from a separate incident) - not best for seeing the ball).


Our style of play seems abrasive - so against the All Blacks (who are tough)

we pick up injuries (Gatland likes this style)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Apparently he took a knock just before that (and

> had on a huge bandage

> around his head (from a separate incident) - not

> best for seeing the ball).

>

OK - But it didn't spare Ronan O Gara being blamed even now for the Lions' series loss to SA eight years ago. Amd he was only on the pitch for about 15 mins at the end of the deisive second test, bleeding, bandaged, possibly concussed.


It's a tough school.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/jul/26/lions-tour-o-gara-south-africa

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Apparently he took a knock just before that

> (and

> > had on a huge bandage

> > around his head (from a separate incident) -

> not

> > best for seeing the ball).

> >

> OK - But it didn't spare Ronan O Gara being blamed

> even now for the Lions' series loss to SA eight

> years ago. Amd he was only on the pitch for about

> 15 mins at the end of the deisive second test,

> bleeding, bandaged, possibly concussed.

>

> It's a tough school.

> https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/jul/26/lion

> s-tour-o-gara-south-africa


Yes - remember that well - There shouldn't really be

this blame game (it's like every time England get

knocked out of a major tournament).


It's the All Blacks in New Zealand - the chances of

winning were never high. Gatland will take the main

part of any blame I think (hope it doesn't wreck him)

Well the good news is they haven't lost yet. I'm unsure who is to blame. Plenty of individual mistakes by players and some by management but the AB's are just very very good. Mind you they do target players and Murray could have picked up a nasty injury. When they beat Ireland in Dublin after losing in Chicago,Ireland had to replace 3 players before halftime if memory serves me correctly. One was an awful late hit.

I agree, I thought Lawes had done more than enough to come in alongside Itoje, and I really don't think a Sexton/Farrell 10 and 12 has enough beef or authority to deter rampaging Blacks. The snippet I caught on the radio this morning had Gatland extolling the virtue of having a right and left footed kicking partnership - handy, for sure, but if that's the best reason you've got...I'm afraid I can see this selection being twenty down at the half. Hope I'm wrong but really doesn't feel right to me.


This from Gerry Guscott on the BBC website: "If I was opposite Farrell and Sexton I'd think all my Christmases had come at once and the All Blacks will think exactly the same thing."

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not a blame game - but as we can still win, it's

> worth pointing out what people did wrong as well

> as right.

>

> Cos' Gatland reads the forum and will listen.


Hansen & Gatland to have beer shock


'Hansen added: "I read somewhere where I lashed out at Warren Gatland. I haven't lashed out at Warren Gatland at all. I have got a lot of respect for him, I am looking forward to having a beer with him and a chuckle about life.'


http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/blacks-boss-steve-hansen-hits-13254981

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They took their time bit it was worth waiting for.

> Sean O'Brien has been cited for I think a straight

> arm tackle. Hearing is this morning.


Think it was a swinging arm as he joined the ruck - as far as I can recall it looked careless rather than malicious, a yellow if the ref had seen it.


Great match and well done Lions - still think that last penalty was a bit harsh though, if the person receiving a pass jumps a few inches in the air when you're already committed to the tackle it's hardly the same as upending a catcher under a high ball. If I were still playing I'd jump in the air every time I took a pass, secure in the knowledge that anyone who hit me would be penalised! Still, makes for a cracking match next weekend.


Wonder what it means for Sonny Bill? I was watching with a Kiwi former teammate who played at a good level over there, he reckoned that would be it, he'll be seen as having let the shirt down and won't be asked again, might have to go back to league. First Kiwi sent off since 1967, first ever on New Zealand soil, apparently. Thought it was a bit harsh initially but multiple replays made it pretty clear...good to see a ref with the strength to go straight red instead of yellow and a citing.

Definitely - I mean technically if one's in mid-stride one's in the air, does that mean the tackler has to time each hit to connect precisely as one's foot touches the ground? I think I'd probably change it to only for receiving kicks - anyone taking a pass, even a poor one like yesterday, is not going to be high enough off the ground to be upended and come down head first, which is what the law is there to stop.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> O'Brien cleared. Good news for Lions. Cut down on

> pens conceded and they're in with a good chance.


Got to drop Vunipola, man's an idiot - not only was he lucky not to be binned before he was but now there's video of him doing the one thing that's really taboo: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/06/30/lionsmako-vunipola-explains-off-the-ball-incident-first-test/


Time for McGrath to start.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > O'Brien cleared. Good news for Lions. Cut down

> on

> > pens conceded and they're in with a good

> chance.

>

> Got to drop Vunipola, man's an idiot - not only

> was he lucky not to be binned before he was but

> now there's video of him doing the one thing

> that's really taboo:

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/06/30/

> lionsmako-vunipola-explains-off-the-ball-incident-

> first-test/

>

> Time for McGrath to start.


To be fair Gatlands words were ...


"If I was physically dominated by the All Blacks then I'd do something about it"


Vunipola (and some of the others) did something about it - just went a bit too far - but it's hard to rein it in once you let it out.


https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/mako-vunipola-hopes-to-prove-gatland-wrong-in-second-test-1.3138892


Gatland knew exactly what he was unleashing.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > O'Brien cleared. Good news for Lions. Cut down

> on

> > pens conceded and they're in with a good

> chance.

>

> Got to drop Vunipola, man's an idiot - not only

> was he lucky not to be binned before he was but

> now there's video of him doing the one thing

> that's really taboo:

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/06/30/

> lionsmako-vunipola-explains-off-the-ball-incident-

> first-test/

>

> Time for McGrath to start.


He would have been pinged if he didn't so he did - don't know really how much it hurt (it could just have been symbolic of not letting go of the binding rather than a grab, squeeze and twist)


Edit: Anyway it seems if Franks minded he's biding his time

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...