Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree I guess, maybe I was a bit dazzled by his exceeding my expectations for him, which were very low. Bit left-field but is it worth considering Jack Nowell at 15? For me he simply hasn't the pace for a top-class wing, but he can catch, tackle and is an excellent counter-attacking runner in broken field play. He's played fullback for the Chiefs on occasion.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well, I was dead wrong about Williams, he played

> a

> > blinder.

>

> Disagree to an extent.

>

> For all the brilliance of starting the move for

> that amazing try, and some other breaks shared

> with Watson, Williams was poor under the high ball

> from start to finish, and has been throughout the

> tour. I still think he shouldn't be playing.

>

> Specifically he missed the simple catch that lead

> to the NZ second half try, the one that killed the

> game. We are missing Rob Kearney and arguably Mike

> Brown under the high ball. Without an effective

> high ball catcher, Conor Murray's box kicks are

> handing over possession to the ABs, chasing those

> seemed to be William's job last Saturday.


Apparently he took a knock just before that (and had on a huge bandage

around his head (from a separate incident) - not best for seeing the ball).


Our style of play seems abrasive - so against the All Blacks (who are tough)

we pick up injuries (Gatland likes this style)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Apparently he took a knock just before that (and

> had on a huge bandage

> around his head (from a separate incident) - not

> best for seeing the ball).

>

OK - But it didn't spare Ronan O Gara being blamed even now for the Lions' series loss to SA eight years ago. Amd he was only on the pitch for about 15 mins at the end of the deisive second test, bleeding, bandaged, possibly concussed.


It's a tough school.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/jul/26/lions-tour-o-gara-south-africa

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Apparently he took a knock just before that

> (and

> > had on a huge bandage

> > around his head (from a separate incident) -

> not

> > best for seeing the ball).

> >

> OK - But it didn't spare Ronan O Gara being blamed

> even now for the Lions' series loss to SA eight

> years ago. Amd he was only on the pitch for about

> 15 mins at the end of the deisive second test,

> bleeding, bandaged, possibly concussed.

>

> It's a tough school.

> https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/jul/26/lion

> s-tour-o-gara-south-africa


Yes - remember that well - There shouldn't really be

this blame game (it's like every time England get

knocked out of a major tournament).


It's the All Blacks in New Zealand - the chances of

winning were never high. Gatland will take the main

part of any blame I think (hope it doesn't wreck him)

Well the good news is they haven't lost yet. I'm unsure who is to blame. Plenty of individual mistakes by players and some by management but the AB's are just very very good. Mind you they do target players and Murray could have picked up a nasty injury. When they beat Ireland in Dublin after losing in Chicago,Ireland had to replace 3 players before halftime if memory serves me correctly. One was an awful late hit.

I agree, I thought Lawes had done more than enough to come in alongside Itoje, and I really don't think a Sexton/Farrell 10 and 12 has enough beef or authority to deter rampaging Blacks. The snippet I caught on the radio this morning had Gatland extolling the virtue of having a right and left footed kicking partnership - handy, for sure, but if that's the best reason you've got...I'm afraid I can see this selection being twenty down at the half. Hope I'm wrong but really doesn't feel right to me.


This from Gerry Guscott on the BBC website: "If I was opposite Farrell and Sexton I'd think all my Christmases had come at once and the All Blacks will think exactly the same thing."

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not a blame game - but as we can still win, it's

> worth pointing out what people did wrong as well

> as right.

>

> Cos' Gatland reads the forum and will listen.


Hansen & Gatland to have beer shock


'Hansen added: "I read somewhere where I lashed out at Warren Gatland. I haven't lashed out at Warren Gatland at all. I have got a lot of respect for him, I am looking forward to having a beer with him and a chuckle about life.'


http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/blacks-boss-steve-hansen-hits-13254981

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They took their time bit it was worth waiting for.

> Sean O'Brien has been cited for I think a straight

> arm tackle. Hearing is this morning.


Think it was a swinging arm as he joined the ruck - as far as I can recall it looked careless rather than malicious, a yellow if the ref had seen it.


Great match and well done Lions - still think that last penalty was a bit harsh though, if the person receiving a pass jumps a few inches in the air when you're already committed to the tackle it's hardly the same as upending a catcher under a high ball. If I were still playing I'd jump in the air every time I took a pass, secure in the knowledge that anyone who hit me would be penalised! Still, makes for a cracking match next weekend.


Wonder what it means for Sonny Bill? I was watching with a Kiwi former teammate who played at a good level over there, he reckoned that would be it, he'll be seen as having let the shirt down and won't be asked again, might have to go back to league. First Kiwi sent off since 1967, first ever on New Zealand soil, apparently. Thought it was a bit harsh initially but multiple replays made it pretty clear...good to see a ref with the strength to go straight red instead of yellow and a citing.

Definitely - I mean technically if one's in mid-stride one's in the air, does that mean the tackler has to time each hit to connect precisely as one's foot touches the ground? I think I'd probably change it to only for receiving kicks - anyone taking a pass, even a poor one like yesterday, is not going to be high enough off the ground to be upended and come down head first, which is what the law is there to stop.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> O'Brien cleared. Good news for Lions. Cut down on

> pens conceded and they're in with a good chance.


Got to drop Vunipola, man's an idiot - not only was he lucky not to be binned before he was but now there's video of him doing the one thing that's really taboo: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/06/30/lionsmako-vunipola-explains-off-the-ball-incident-first-test/


Time for McGrath to start.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > O'Brien cleared. Good news for Lions. Cut down

> on

> > pens conceded and they're in with a good

> chance.

>

> Got to drop Vunipola, man's an idiot - not only

> was he lucky not to be binned before he was but

> now there's video of him doing the one thing

> that's really taboo:

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/06/30/

> lionsmako-vunipola-explains-off-the-ball-incident-

> first-test/

>

> Time for McGrath to start.


To be fair Gatlands words were ...


"If I was physically dominated by the All Blacks then I'd do something about it"


Vunipola (and some of the others) did something about it - just went a bit too far - but it's hard to rein it in once you let it out.


https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/mako-vunipola-hopes-to-prove-gatland-wrong-in-second-test-1.3138892


Gatland knew exactly what he was unleashing.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > O'Brien cleared. Good news for Lions. Cut down

> on

> > pens conceded and they're in with a good

> chance.

>

> Got to drop Vunipola, man's an idiot - not only

> was he lucky not to be binned before he was but

> now there's video of him doing the one thing

> that's really taboo:

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/rugby-union/2017/06/30/

> lionsmako-vunipola-explains-off-the-ball-incident-

> first-test/

>

> Time for McGrath to start.


He would have been pinged if he didn't so he did - don't know really how much it hurt (it could just have been symbolic of not letting go of the binding rather than a grab, squeeze and twist)


Edit: Anyway it seems if Franks minded he's biding his time

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...