Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good series win for Ireland

> Sexton's season. Grand slam, Heineken Cup, pro 14,

> Series win in Australia


As an aussie, gutted to lose the game. But what a cracking series it has been. Ireland are fully deserving victors, but each game ebbed and flowed, and was always in doubt to the bitter end. Both teams actually scored exactly 55 points across the 3 tests, indicatin how tight it was...

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And in the far flung future when civilizations had

> risen and fallen and whole generations had

> forgotten why, still the claims were made...

> "Hundred!" they cried! God loves staying power

> doc.


Thanks maxxi. I am but a mere messenger of the god of hundred whose name in only mentioned in whispers and when talking about money, specifically sterling.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ireland could now reach number 1 in the world

> rankings by beating the All Blacks by more than 7

> points in the autumn.


OMG - i now have the wobbles. Ireland number one in the world at just about anything, has never happened.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ireland could now reach number 1 in the world

> > rankings by beating the All Blacks by more than

> 7

> > points in the autumn.

>

> OMG - i now have the wobbles. Ireland number one

> in the world at just about anything, has never

> happened.


It is the All Blacks - but if anyone can at the moment it's Ireland.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ireland could now reach number 1 in the world

> > rankings by beating the All Blacks by more than

> 7

> > points in the autumn.

>

> OMG - i now have the wobbles. Ireland number one

> in the world at just about anything, has never

> happened.


Ah jeez Mick, there's loads of things........


http://www.dailyedge.ie/ireland-best-in-the-world-1207486-Dec2013/

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ireland could now reach number 1 in the world

> rankings by beating the All Blacks by more than 7

> points in the autumn.


Not sure about that - Ireland have three matches before meeting the ABs (albeit against Italy, Argentina and USA) and the ABs have six games to play in the Championship beforehand, all of which can make a massive difference to the rankings.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ireland could now reach number 1 in the world

> > rankings by beating the All Blacks by more than

> 7

> > points in the autumn.

>

> Not sure about that - Ireland have three matches

> before meeting the ABs (albeit against Italy,

> Argentina and USA) and the ABs have six games to

> play in the Championship beforehand, all of which

> can make a massive difference to the rankings.


I was reading SportsJoe LOL :) but it is possible (If both teams win the next games it doesn't make nuch difference apparently as they're so far ahead - if either lose it all changes of course


https://www.sportsjoe.ie/rugby/ireland-rugby-world-rankings-2-165222

  • 4 months later...

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about that tackle by Wilkinson

>

> Legal or not so legal.


You mean Farrell I assume - shocker, no attempt to wrap and too high (although to be fair Esterhuizen was going down at the time of the hit). Very lucky to get away with it. Farrell's tackle technique has always been suspect, it's shoulder first and wrap after impact - in the current climate he's going to get a wallet-full of yellows if he doesn't change.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What about that tackle by Wilkinson

> >

> > Legal or not so legal.

>

> You mean Farrell I assume - shocker, no attempt to

> wrap and too high (although to be fair Esterhuizen

> was going down at the time of the hit). Very

> lucky to get away with it. Farrell's tackle

> technique has always been suspect, it's shoulder

> first and wrap after impact - in the current

> climate he's going to get a wallet-full of yellows

> if he doesn't change.


Yes, I'm getting my English players past and present mixed up.


General consensus seems he was lucky. I think he'll avoid a citing as yellow only.

Was anyone else at Twickenham today? We got there well over an hour before kickoff but such were the inadequate arrangements for ticketing and security checks we just managed to make it to our seats (by sprinting across the concourse) in time for the haka. Standing for nearly an hour packed like sardines with thousands of others queuing in the pissing rain didn't make for the best pre-match buildup, surely when the RFU is charging us ?160 a ticket they could afford a few more staff and have more gates open?


On the plus side once we were in it was brilliant!

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?160 a ticket? Where were you? Is there a Royal

> Box?

>

> Good game though with another controversial

> moment.


Bog standard seats and face value - and those were by no means the most expensive available! Sinful really but a 50th birthday present to myself.


Great game - having looked at it several times I think Lawes was marginally offside, but only ourselves to blame, we could have won it with a drop goal at the death if they'd organised themselves properly.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Great game - having looked at it several times I

> think Lawes was marginally offside, but only

> ourselves to blame, we could have won it with a

> drop goal at the death if they'd organised

> themselves properly.


That decision - the one England player in the ruck was inverted apparently - his feet were near the NZ side. What does "behind the last players feet" mean :)


Sometimes I realise how little I know of the current Laws even though I've watched since the 70s.


Another controversial tackle/attempted charge down in the Wales game also.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> That decision - the one England player in the ruck

> was inverted apparently - his feet were near the

> NZ side. What does "behind the last players feet"

> mean :)

>

> Sometimes I realise how little I know of the

> current Laws even though I've watched since the

> 70s.

>

> Another controversial tackle/attempted charge down

> in the Wales game also.


Assume (though the laws are not unambiguously clear) the line is drawn on the last body part of any player in the ruck? Otherwise the tackled player could go down feet first and effectively eliminate offside.


It was very marginal and really dependent on the millisecond between the NZ flyhalf having his hands on the ball (still in the ruck) and lifting it from the turf (open play). Apparently Garcez was unable to make the decision himself as due to the conditions he couldn't see the big screen clearly - if we're going to have TV reviews perhaps in such conditions a sheltered screen, such as used for soccer VAR, might be needed - there were actually a bunch of screens near me for the use of those in the disabled section that would have done the trick. One thing I haven't seen much commented on but I thought was disgraceful was that the ABs, after watching one replay on the big screen, decided it was offside and marched up the pitch to the point of the infringement before Garcez had decided - that was clear intimidation.


The charge down/tackle on Halfpenny was very poor I think and Kerevi was lucky not to be sanctioned - the legitimacy of the chargedown attempt was dubious, as he leapt from a point and at a time when it was clear he couldn't possibly get near the ball, then seemed to make no attempt to check or change course before giving LH a smash which sent him out of the game. Citing commisioners should be having a look at that, I think.

  • 2 years later...

The size of the Bok forwards is only dwarfed by the enormity of the disgraceful antics of Rassie last week.....


After being lauded as a great manager post RWC; I hear a comment this week by a well known rugby luminary who asked "Does Rassie mean d!ckhead in Afrikaans?"....


Anyway....hoping for a cracking game tomorrow afternoon...and hoping the AB's dont pump my boys too much at Eden Park tomorrow morning as a lead-in!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...