Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm joking - England look a very good side. Ireland are slightly less consistent of late but still a force on their day. You hammered us at Twickenham last year. No Paul O Connell and no Tommy Bowe does weaken us a bit combined with Tualagi coming back has you as slight favourites on betfair, but its anyone's game, and a big test of England's new team.

Hi All


If you're looking for somewhere to watch the 6N, Dulwich Sports Ground are showing all the games. KCH Rugby Club will be there in force, so it should be a good rugby (but family friendly!) atmosphere. The 1st XV are playing away on Saturday, but should be back for the late kick off and there should be a good crowd for Sunday's game.


Beer is cheap, there will be food available and it's only a short walk from the middle of Dulwich Village.


If any of you are players (or you know anyone who is) and fancy joining us on the field, training is on Tuesday night and full details of the club can be found here: www.kchrugby.com our first team are competitive in the Kent 1 league and we put out a regular 2nd XV in a more social league.


You'll find us at Dulwich Sports Ground, 104 Turney Road, SE217JH (the old South Bank University sports ground) anyone who has had contact with us before - please note we have moved home recently. This is our current address.


Enjoy the games!

Iain

KCH 2nd XV

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Scotland 18 Italy 24

> France 33 Wales 21

> Ireland 25 England 21

>

> I'm sure I can catch up.


There isn't a rule for late entries given you're as likely to score minus points as plus points. So if you can think of one, put it to the committee.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Scotland 18 Italy 24

> > France 28 Wales 15

> > Ireland 21 England 24

>

> Apologies maxxi. I missed your late entry last

> week. Will add it and update when I get home.



I was blissfully ignorant as I couldn't read your 'results table' attachment anyway! I only entered so I might have a chance of being in the top three (well four now) :)

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can you open this maxxi?


Yes - though I wish I hadn't... I bet you can work out the Duckworth-Lewis too can't you?


Where are you Gingerbeer?

> If the rest of you want to be included I would

> have to change the original rules and start you

> with a minus 40 non Grand Slam entry (given

> maxxi's score). Ok with that?


I am sensing a pattern...

Well, I've introduced the additional guessers (or is it chancers) into the equation with a suitable penalty for missing a week. This was worked out using a complex formula and then subtracting 3 from maxxi's score.


Still, plenty of points to be won. Gingerbeer,you have until 14.30 to get your entry in or face a deduction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...