Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

And don't even think of letting anyone have access to them.


18/6: edited to remove an example selection of ten icon smileys (five of them animated). Even a few seconds of them can make some feel queasy. :-(


The ascii versions, as eg used above and by Sue below, are of course always usable. Ed [22/6]: But now again likely to be translated by the forum software into the graphic ones.

Dear Admin,


Have we ever had any thoughts about a proper jobs section? Either advertising local jobs or for smaller london firms looking to tap into local East Dulwich talent? I don't feel it fits within the tradesmen cleaners section or the general classifieds (more item based) and could warrant a place of its own. Nor am I talking pyramid schemes, spam or make ???'s whilst at home junk. I'm thinking any jobs in local shops, bars or SME's or any central London firms looking for part time workers (of which there are lots in the happy nappy valley of SE22).


I've struggled to find a suitable spot for mine and so just wanted to check where's best?


Thank you in advance.

  • Administrator

Hi


We have had a couple of requests about it before but I don't think it warrants an entire section on its own. I want to keep the forum as compact as possible with as few sections as possible otherwise it will become a sprawling mass, I would only be persuaded if there was a big call for a jobs section however at the moment there's not.


Thank you for your suggestion though, and it is on the list of possible new sections but in the meantime please post it in the East Dulwich business section as long as it's an ED business looking for someone.

I've not used anything that's not on the forum server. But i don't think I dare say any more.


But while I'm here, can I at least gripe again about the way the forum software erroneously treats some ascii strings. Below is an arithmetic series. Look what it does to the bracketed 6 term. All that's needed to correct that behaviour is to change the mapping in the smileys file, or remove the entry entirely. I assume that not many people use the ascii form for input anyway, or that it's canonical for that particular smiley.


(4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. My own view is that the BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this a story, more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty time, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to "...fight. We fight like Hell and if you don't fight like Hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. Both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They also face a1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented and outrageous act from the apparent 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet is ridiculous'. It is very clear that there the Telegraph would love to end the BBC. For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him where to go, does shoe a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...