Jump to content

WANTED: Full time nanny


aimee-lou

Recommended Posts

Fun loving, flexible, full time nanny wanted: 4-5 days a week, 8:30am-5:30pm.


I have two little boys (nearly 1 and 3 year olds) who are mostly great and sometimes little buggers...but I love them and think they are pretty awesome! I am looking for someone with lots of energy, creativity and love to keep them entertained and happy, but to also ensure they are respectful and well-mannered (as much as you can for young children that is!).


Duties to include:


- dressing children in the morning

- organise daily activities, outings, play dates etc

- pick up / drop off older child to nursery (starting later in the year)

- prepare nutritious and balanced meals for the children

- assisting them in the development of language, letters, numbers etc

- cleaning insofar as it relates to the children eg. putting toys away, washing dishes, children's laundry

- bathing children after dinner on occasion

- taking children to medical appointments where necessary and care for them if they become ill

- keeping me and the children's father updated on daily welfare of children including keeping a brief log / journal


Will want nanny to be ofsted registered and have all up to date qualifications, CRB checks and references. Car / driving licence not essential. Previous experience looking after two or more children desirable. Nanny must also love dogs as I have two small lovable pugs. Not a prerequisite, but would also be nice if nanny would be willing to travel overseas on family holidays on rare occasion (times to be pre-agreed in advance).


In short, we are an Aussie family who are pretty relaxed and essentially want someone that takes great care of the boys and with whom we get along with. We also want someone who is willing to sign on for a minimum of a year or more. If you think you might be our Mary Poppins, please send me your CV to [email protected]


Position to start early March if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Well worth signing up to become a "supporter" as they send their updates and often shed light on things the council and their supporters would rather didn't get too much attention! https://www.onedulwich.uk/get-involved
    • Spot on...and they rant against "anonymous" groups like One Dulwich and then post missives from "anonymous" lobby groups like Clean Air Dulwich without any sense of hypocrisy or irony...
    • The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...