Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know anything about the sewer that runs beneath Pellatt road? Any residents know if this could cause problems with subsidence or affect our chances of getting planning permission for a kitchen extension? We are close to completing on a property on this road but just found out about the sewer and are worried it could prevent us from doing a side return. Does anyone know of any issues with surface water or sewage leaking too? Many thanks.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/94514-sewer-beneath-pellatt-road/
Share on other sites

The main Effra Branch Sewer passes along Lordship Lane but I don't think it goes down Pellatt Road. Maybe there is another sewer underneath Pellatt Road, probably only a minor one though.


Courtesy of John K, I have some detailed maps which are way too large to upload. These show the Effra Branch Sewer as it heads NE from Dulwich Village (junction with Court Lane) over fields to join Lordship Lane just north of Elm House i.e. roughly where Colwell Street joins Lordship Lane; on the way, it crosses what is now Townley Road roughly with Beauval Road. The sewer then follows Lordship Lane past Blackwater Cotttage before crossing Lordship Lane at North Cross Road to head NE to up with East Dulwich Road just past Crystal Palace Road and then heading off to Nunhead. Attached maps may help and the link below is an appropriate map from about the same time.


http://www.mappalondon.com/london/south-east/peckham-rye.jpg

I think you are referring to the very large water main that was run from somewhere West (Mitcham way?) to Honor Oak reservoir several years ago. It is deep and large. They came round inspecting houses and taking pictures to avoid claims for any subsidence claims from the boring for it's installation. Cuts through around the Landcroft Road / Pellatt Road junction area heading in the direction of the Great Exhibition.

I'm with mikeB.


The two types of sewer should cause no problems.


There may be a problem if your neighbours' outlets to the foul sewer run under your house.


Thames Water ran a public consultation for the new water ring main. For a short time maps showing the route and depth of the main were available. It is deep tunneling. Thames Water would probably send a copy.


John K

We live On pellatt Road. Had no idea About sewer. Applied for side return and kitchen extension and got full approval but pulled out last minute for other reasons. Architects and builders had no concerns. No mention of problem with sewer. No issues with sewage water or surface leaks or subsidence either. Hope that helps, feel free to contact me if you need more info.

I can't find a map of the southern extension to the London Ring Main on the web, though as John says Thames Water may be able to help. The list of streets below was posted on the forum in 2008 in an alarmist post and presumably came from a leaflet at the time


Beechdale Road

Fairmount Road

Arodene Road

Helix Road

Leander Road

Arlington Road

Brailsford Road

Dulwich Road

Half Moon Lane

Carver Road

Ruskin Walk

Village way

East Dulwich Grove (Village End only)

Gilkes Crescent

Calton Avenue

Townley Road

Dovercourt Road

Beauval Road

Landcroft Road

Rodwell Road

Heber Road

Cyrena Road

Crystal Palace Road

Landells RoadBarry Road

Underhill Road

Upland Road

Forest Hill Road

Dovedale Road

Shelbury Road

Scutari Road

Mundania Road

Homestall Road


A straight line from Honor Oak reservoir to Brixton pumping station would look something like the attached, but given the length, small changes north / south for the start / finish move the line a lot. And it seems that the tunnel didn't quite follow a straight line e.g. see fig 3 on page 20 of this, which shows the route meandering slightly as it passes under Brockwell Park https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/14156/6/Quarterly%20Journal%20of%20Engineering%20Geology%20and%20Hydrogeology_46_2_2013.pdf


Apparently the tunnel was 4.85k long vs 4.68k as a straight line, so not far off.


Given the main is 45m deep and immensely strong, I don't really think there is anything to worry about, compared with more likely movement from clay shrinkage from nearby trees, general subsidence etc.

If memory serves the main kink was northward at c2km to avoid the fault line.


The boreholes and seismic shocks were looking for Lambeth Group faeces and the East Dulwich earthquake fault.


The conclusion was that the earthquake fault runs under St Barnabas Church and then onward to Honor Oak.


John K

I fear we are now off topic, but I thought the bravery of Mr Cox's family in trying the 'water' was commendable, with "success" apparently being defined as "not dying". Maybe they were after a cure for 'Barrennefs':


https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zY1hAAAAcAAJ&lpg=PA286&ots=wbLS1rNOHf&dq=%22dulwich%20waters%22&pg=PA286#v=onepage&q=%22dulwich%20waters%22&f=false

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...