Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It does work, certainy in the sense that it relaxes you and gives you positive expectations of labour. I have never actuallu tried the techniques in labour (you'd need a coach) but I did listen to an mp3 in the early stages. Both my births (ds1 - 8lb 7, plus twins later on) have been easy and ecstatic.


I did find that the techniques helped me alleviate backpain... they do work!

I'd say it's definitely worth a try, even if it only gives you another strategy to use. I used a cd in the run up to my third birth, and it was definitely the easiest birth of all- same speed and intensity of the second, but I did, honestly feel much more positive and able to cope with the labour. Can't say for definite that was all down to the cd, but I do think it helped- being able to relax can only help reduce pain. Sorry would lend you the cd but have a friend I've already promised it to.

My experience is a bit like Fuschia's. The hypnobirthing book (and to an extent cd although I wasn't too crazy about the voices on any of the CDs which made it harder to get "into" it) was one of the various things that helped me feel very confident about being able to have a natural birth. Before reading the book or listening to the CDs I thought I wanted to have a proper hypnobirth but after feeling so-so about a few things in the book and not getting into hypnosis during a session with a local hypnotherapist I decided to just use the method for general relaxation and confidence purposes.


I had a great homebirth, mainly using one of the breathing techniques and one of the birthing positions learned during pregnancy yoga (all the other techniques we learned at yoga were great during class and during mid to late pregnancy but I ended up using just one of each for birth - good enough for me!) and again, the confidence built up during the chats we had with the teacher in and after class was the most important bit.


Another thought that helped me loads was "everyone in Holland does it naturally, my mum did, my sister did, my friends did so I can do it too" (I grew up in Holland where epidurals are only available for medical emergencies. I don't agree with this policy - you should be able to choose - but it did provide me with a large pool of evidence of successful natural births).


With two weeks to go you're probably a bit late to go for a full immersion or conversion to the hypnobirthing method, but I'm sure that it'll help you get focus and rest.


Just my opinion and experience of course!

I would firmly advocate that positive thinking and training yourself not to be scared of birth/contractions does help. I did a short course on hypnobirthing with a lovely local practitioner, Natalie at yoursmaternally.co.uk, and coped well with several days of contractions. Sounds a horror story, but they genuinely didn't hurt while I was in the right mindset. Unfortunately I had my heart set on a home birth, so when I had to go into hosp due to failure to progress, I lost my focus completely, and then it bl**dy hurt!!

I tried reading the Marie Mongan book but was far too airy fairy for my taste, and made a lot of claims I simply couldn't believe. I found the term 'hypnobirthing' very misleading, as in my case (and as several above say) it had nothing to do with what I would think of as hypnosis.

Would highly recommend Natalie. Maybe you could give her a bell to see if she thinks you have enough time to fit in sufficient sessions? Good luck!

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...