Railway rise

[Blah Blah]

Also there are only two ways that private land owners can enforce no parking, and that is by fines and PCNs (clamping is no longer legal) or by physically restricting access by gate/ lock/ barrier. So if the landowner wants to enforce unauthroised parking/use, the only option they have is to hire a parking enforcement company/gate keeper. This is how commercial premises control parking on their land.

[DunstansRoadDweller]

I am in complete agreement with you Richard, the behaviour of that woman is wholly unreasonable and needs to stop. We have has similar encounters on the rare occasion we pick up loved ones and its is very anti-social indeed, nevermind her taking pictures of other peoples cars with no authorisation. I feel there are other personal issues afoot which should not be taken out on the innocent public trying to go about their daily lives.

[Nigello]

nevermind her taking pictures of other peoples cars with no authorisation. - Why do you need permission to take a picture, on a private road or not? It makes even less sense if that private road belongs to the person who is taking the photos. Other aspects of her behaviour may well be unreasonable but I cannot see that one falling into that category. If private road rules extend to photography, I'd be happy to be corrected.

[Lynne]

So, if I understand it correctly, the lane area is part of the site. But there must be access allowed to the builder's centre. Is it a right of way? Or a flying access only? If it only allows access then we can't park or wait

I agree that it seems normal enough to use it as a pick up point as spider69 says but unfortunately normal and legal aren't necessarily the same.

Talking of access, when can we turn into the side road by Denmark Hill Station. That piece of wood and fence seem to have no real purpose apart from causing trouble on the main road as cars do illegal turns there when dropping off train passengers.

[rupert james]

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nevermind her taking pictures of other peoples

> cars with no authorisation. - Why do you need

> permission to take a picture, on a private road or

> not? It makes even less sense if that private road

> belongs to the person who is taking the photos.

> Other aspects of her behaviour may well be

> unreasonable but I cannot see that one falling

> into that category. If private road rules extend

> to photography, I'd be happy to be corrected.

edhistory Wrote:

If you had looked at the plans you would have seen that the land in question is part of the old garden centre freehold and runs to the railway cottages boundary.

[Blah Blah]

'Why do you need permission to take a picture, on a private road or not?'

You can only legally take pictures on private land with the permission of the landowner.

[edhistory]

So, is this now resolved?