Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hello forum users


My 7 week old son has been having a red rashes which appear from nowhere spread along his cheek and like magic just disappear within a few hours, lately a few of the spots have remained and have become dry and quite sharp to the touch. My GP tells me it's baby acne which is normal and nothing to worry about, I have google baby acne and couldn't find any such condition.


I am become increasingly worried with this condition and was wondering if anyone has heard of baby acne or has experience anything like this with there own children


Thanks Sarah

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/95705-baby-acne/
Share on other sites

Hi Sarah,


My son had 'acne' spots all over his face at about the same age. I was reassured that it was common, especially in boys, that it possibly relates to the mother's hormones in the baby's system and that it would clear - which it did, completely and without scarring. We were very careful not to touch it or pick at it in any way.


The only thing I would add however is that your description doesn't really match with the way my son's skin looked - it just looked like teenage spots and there was no fading away during the day - so it may be worth seeking out a second opinion.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/95705-baby-acne/#findComment-966327
Share on other sites

The skin of babies in their first few months can change almost every day, influenced by many different factors - withdrawing hormones as per Emse above, reaction to general substances in the environment etc. Your baby's skin has previously not been exposed to much whilst floating around in amniotic fluid. Acne is completely normal and can come in lots of different guises...and can be quite fleeting or take a while to fade. Unsightly but nothing to worry about.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/95705-baby-acne/#findComment-966332
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...