Jump to content

Live Band or DJ

kittygaz

By kittygaz
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

kittygaz

kittygaz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry just changed the title to wanted to get a bit more attention.


Hi,


Looking to have a party and would like to have either a live band playing 70's or 80's or

a DJ doing likewise with a bit of recent stuff thrown in for the young uns. If anyone has any

suggestions or recomendations locally I would be most grateful.


Cheers

RosieH

RosieH

Posted
Posted

I'll second Bare Groove for a bit of a boogie.


But would just ask the question, does it have to be one or the other? Nice to have a DJ spinning a few party favourites (like Bare Groove though I do, I can't imagine them doing Hit Me Baby One More Time - or have I missed something fairly spectactular..?) Or even set up a playlist on an ipod and have a live band (think you can set it so that they mix into each other rather than having a gap between songs, or have I imagined that?)

Keef

Keef

Posted
Posted

Hi, I am in Bare Groove so declaring that from the off.


As Rosie said, it doesn't necessarily have to be one or the other, we play music between sets, and let people choose the type of stuff they want.


However, not every event suits a band, and not every venue suits a band! If you'd like to discuss options with me, send me a Private Message on here, or email us via our website. No worries if not though, a band does tend to be a big thing, and not every party suits it.


Rosie, believe it or not, Baby one more time did use to be in our set, it was a reggae, rock, pop fusion like nothing you've ever heard before! ... It hasn't been in our set for over a year though, so not sure what that says about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • Sephiroth
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • HeadNun
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • Rockets
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By Rockets · Posted

      To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...