Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm., if women are so good at multi-tasking how

> come they can't have a headache and a shag at the

> same time.



Jah Lush! For shame - I thought you were a gentleman.


Gentle sex has been proven* to be a good cure for both headaches** and period pain.




*somewhere by someone but I can't remember who or where, but that's my line and I'm sticking to it

** hmm, although perhaps not hangover headaches

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember when there was a thread about the

> Russian Mafia, prostitutes and used condoms in

> East Dulwich. Can anyone remember who started the

> thread?


________________________________________________________


It was him "CS" again & I was thinking about that twatty post earlier today.


It's probably mikecg or one of his " counterrevolutionarysmashthesystemmangang "


Boring though



W**F

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect they can but choose not to........but

> it's only a suspicion. We need a survey. Ladies,

> please oblige.


No survey required Declan, you are entirely correct. There is a way of getting us to oblige whilst tolerating our headache, and I would tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.


Can't betray the multitasking sisterhood.

Roll Deep wrote:-

I bet it does Steve, you dark horse you...



Hardly a dark horse Roll Deep, most people see my jokes coming from a mile off!




Legalbeagle wrote:- There is a way of getting us to oblige whilst tolerating our headache.....



Never let wedding cake touch thy lips, nor wedding band on that finger.....would be my guess.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Roll Deep wrote:-

> I bet it does Steve, you dark horse you...

>

>

> Hardly a dark horse Roll Deep, most people see my

> jokes coming from a mile off!

>

>

>

> Legalbeagle wrote:- There is a way of getting us

> to oblige whilst tolerating our headache.....

>

>

> Never let wedding cake touch thy lips, nor wedding

> band on that finger.....would be my guess.


No no no MrT, not at all! Mr Beagle says I'm much nicer to him since we got married! I tut in your general direction.

computedshorty Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------

> Might it be imagination on your part to suggest

> that I am talking to myself.

, and some times a

> complete fool.

> I only carry on a subject that gets replies of

> interest shown.


> This does with your distasteful message make me

> considder Do I want to remain here?

> Regards Shorty.


_____________________________________________________


Dear Shorty


*m&m's "Stan" plays in the background*


There's a guy who lives near me who for all intents or purpose would describe him self as a transvestite


That is he wears womens clothes, applies listick & eye shadow

Trouble is he does it so badly, so cheaply & without any charm or taste


So really he's a guy in a dress but lazily alludes to being a woman

We know he's a guy, he knows we know, we know he knows, that we know


So why pretend. Well it seems he likes the attention


He sits in the doctors surgery with a friend "Oh my cock's itcy" he loudly pipes up, seeking more attention. Everyones so used to him that he just gets overlooked. "Yeah that stupid geezer who wears women's clothes" Even my kids ignor him, they don't even point him out anymore


The sad reason people laugh at him, is not out of prejustice but because he's just a crap tranny


Other Transvestites would disown him for sure


So in short he does it because he can


In short I'm sure you too do it because you can

Though you know, that we know, that you are a composite construction, a fake


You're not really a very good "old man" & that's fine, it's an exercise , a run to see how far it can be taken


So don't let anyone but your real self give it up, we'll go along with you, if that's what you want


What gives you away ? Well the language construction is to contemporary, the grammar is deliberately staggered & juddered even.

Though a genuine "old man" may stammer in his speech, his written words still flow,"t's" crossed "I's" dotted, punctuation "proper", catch my drift


Your other posting "characters" give away your technical skills with a computer, to advanced for a man of advanced years.

The syntax and rhythms of your voice is over constructed, & the spelling mistakes too deliberate


An old man who could up load images to a forum could surely use spell check, no ?


So in short "computedshorty" keep up the good "work"


You know we know, you know !


http://www.amazon.com/My-Life-Fake-Peter-Carey/dp/0375414983




W**F



P.s


Oh & I am a "real dog" BTW, all this written with my paws, yes indeed so it was

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...