Jump to content

Recommended Posts

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ted thank you for your assumptions, I have never

> pretended that a presentation was mine or included

> my name to it.

> The items that I posted of the Vi & Vii Bombs were

> Steve's who is a member here he raised no

> objection to those being used to further his

> investigations, and even stated it here.

> You are making unsupported remarks that are

> guiding others to think your way, and act on your

> belief.

> I need no instruction on the use of how to use my

> posts.

> Might it be imagination on your part to suggest

> that I am talking to myself.

> Thank you for giving me credit of other members, I

> do not want it.

> In my very limited time using the computer things

> are learnt, such as one member picking errors in

> anothers posts never looking at his/her own, that

> often show him as dominant, and some times a

> complete fool.

> If you would prefer that I did not post then say

> so, as the members might agree with you, but on

> the other hand may support me, and reject you.

> I only carry on a subject that gets replies of

> interest shown.

> I have some very doubtful thoughts of members but

> I do not usually respond to a personal attack.

> I joined this website to find my previous

> neighbours and friends but they have not responded

> as I looks that they are gone.

> This does with your distasteful message make me

> considder Do I want to remain here?

> Regards Shorty.


Well, at least you did not fake your death resurrect yourself as a grieving friend and have 50 people want to fly to a Mets (Ugh) game in your honour, only to be outted as a hoax....on my only other forum, Bruce Springteen!!


Perhaps, that story actually belongs on the Scumbag of the Year thread!

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> legalbeagle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mr Beagle has now returned from his curry and

> > beers and is sniggering loudly at this thread!

>

>

> Is this a 'clue' to your secret...? Though I

> haven't a clue myself of what you're on about!



Sorry Brum, you sent me this message way past my bedtime! No, no clue intended, he really had just gone out for beers and a curry! As had you I suspect? I hope you haven't spoilt your voice for tonight!

Legalbeagle wrote:- Mr Beagle has now returned from his curry and beers and is sniggering loudly at this thread!



AAAH HAAA so that's his secret, he has a sense of humour........and he doesn't mind a take away curry slopped into his feeding bowl.


So to summarise provided your fur-less beagle doesn't complain about you not cooking,

and uncomplainingly coping with bowell moving curries on a regular basis,

and never complaining about hours of potential cooking, grooming, and caressing time, being wantonly wasted on the forum, your marriage is a sound bet.


Did Mr Beagle become furless in the last nine years or so, because if that is the case, I think I see a pattern emerging.


I presume you legalbeagle are full of healthy bristling fur,

and have a full set of your own teeth,

and that has absolutely nothing to do with having your own way,

not cooking for,

nor serving,

the fur-less beloved etc.


and spending waaaaay to much time forumising with I quote 'a perverted quadruped groomer'

by one who I assume (according to his title) is very knowledgable about such matters.



Come to think of it, many marriages would be a sound bet when the opposition succeeds in getting all their own way.


I suspect mr fur-less may be pursued when the local populace of available singles read what a gem he is, one of the old school of bearing his burdens with good grace.


I bet you don't dare take him anywhere near drinks on Friday at the Black Cherry,

lest he is taken for a walk in the heat of the moment by a passing vamp-hound.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Legalbeagle wrote:- Mr Beagle has now returned

> from his curry and beers and is sniggering loudly

> at this thread!

>

>

> AAAH HAAA so that's his secret, he has a sense of

> humour........and he doesn't mind a take away

> curry slopped into his feeding bowl.

>

> So to summarise provided your fur-less beagle

> doesn't complain about you not cooking,

> and uncomplainingly coping with bowell moving

> curries on a regular basis,

> and never complaining about hours of potential

> cooking, grooming, and caressing time, being

> wantonly wasted on the forum, your marriage is a

> sound bet.

>

> Did Mr Beagle become furless in the last nine

> years or so, because if that is the case, I think

> I see a pattern emerging.

>

> I presume you legalbeagle are full of healthy

> bristling fur,

> and have a full set of your own teeth,

> and that has absolutely nothing to do with having

> your own way,

> not cooking for,

> nor serving,

> the fur-less beloved etc.

>

> and spending waaaaay to much time forumising with

> I quote 'a perverted quadruped groomer'

> by one who I assume (according to his title) is

> very knowledgable about such matters.

>

>

> Come to think of it, many marriages would be a

> sound bet when the opposition succeeds in getting

> all their own way.

>

> I suspect mr fur-less may be pursued when the

> local populace of available singles read what a

> gem he is, one of the old school of bearing his

> burdens with good grace.

>

> I bet you don't dare take him anywhere near drinks

> on Friday at the Black Cherry,

> lest he is taken for a walk in the heat of the

> moment by a passing vamp-hound.


LOL!!!


However I must put you right on a few things. Mr Beagle had curry and beers outside of our home last night with a few of his mates, because he wanted to, and because I am a nice wife, he gets to go out just about whenever he likes. I'm sorry to tell you that I'm in fact quite a good cook (though Mr Beagle is better) so the arguments in this house are more about who has been hogging the kitchen rather than who has to cook. In fact Mr Beagle also bakes all our bread. A proper Mrs Beaton and no mistake. Further, it is an accepted fact in our house that Mr Beagle wins nearly all the arguments, since he is, annoyingly, much cleverer than I am. But I do have one or two tricks up my sleeve that ensure I win the battles I need to.


Sadly I cannot bring him to the forum drinks as I will be in Hong Kong visiting a friend while he holds the fort and looks after our two beaglets. Lest you think this proof that I gad about while the poor boy does all the work, he fully accepts that, after four years in a row of going away for a week on a boys trip whilst I hold the fort, it is indeed my turn. In fact, bless him, it was his idea. I don't doubt that if I did take him to the drinks many a young lady would consider him quite a catch, but he'd never leave me. No one else has such good access to alcohol at cost.


Finally, I must point out that Mr Beagle is not furless by any means. He just has very little hair on his head.


But I forgive him this small failing. After all, bird don't make nest in bare tree.

Ah I see. Sorry his existence had passed me by. So this persons technique has been utilised on Mr Beagle by me? Or needs to be applied to me? I wasn't sure what Mr T's reference was to. Either way I sense he is becoming mean and tetchy again, and if that's the case I shall be cross and upset and shall call him to task. Mr and Mrs Spank will be paying short sharp trip to botty land.

I remember the time during the sixties when you could have a night drinking, dancing, smoking and some other good things if you got lucky,


like a cab home when it was pelting with rain,


and still have change from a quid.


I remember when the pound was not a banana republic bank note..........where as today you need to have five hundred in your pocket to get a hard on...............................................those were the days.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...