Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sean - these cars stay in situ for several hours ,they're not just parked for a few minutes while ticketing a car.

They have chaps on mopeds for that.

One parked in Bellenden this morning for over 3 hours .

Think they're more to do with speeding - speed camera sign put up outside bank near Somerfield ,Lordship Lane yeaterday.

still don't see a massive problem - if the problem is road safety and road space then these cars are a teeeeeeeeny tiny part of the problem and may be doing more good than harm - if you want safer roads and more room on them go to the source of the problem

Not top of my list of worries - but illegal parking is dangerous and bad example.

I presume that these cars are around to reduce illegal parking and speeding.

But wouldn't they be more effective if their presence and purpose were advertised more widely.

Sorry Sean but you've been guilty of bleating about other things you think are important in the past so don't slate other people who think that council hypocracy is important. Not sure what you meant about the comment re breast feeding to teenage years but it seemed a bit of an adolescent comment itself.


We had a near fatal accident in our street caused by someone parking on the corner (and a lorry swinging out to avoid it). The CEO vehicles park on that corner consistently. They need to set an example rather than doing it themselves and put people at risk 'because they can'.


The car in the photo on this thread was parked there for a good bit of the afternoon so there was no worries about missing 'guilty' cars while looking for a space. Additionally, since there are two of them in every CEO car, they could quite easily drop one guy off and then find a safe place to park.



SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> +

>

> Oh I don't know - many drivers seem to subscribe

> to "just because you can't doesn't mean you

> can't"

>

> The bleating on this thread beggars belief. Were

> y'all breast fed until teenage years or

> something?

>

> If people weren't parking illegaly then these guys

> wouldn't even exist for you to moan about. you are

> putting the horse before the cart so to speak

>

> As stated before - if these guys have to go and

> find a "proper" parking space and walk back to the

> guilty car the chances are it'll be gone. Much

> like police chasing after joy-riders don't stick

> to the legal speed limit because... come on you

> can do this... because...

>

> If the roads are dangerous places it isn't because

> of these wardens

The red council Smart car that does the rounds with the periscope on it is absoutely there for catching people speeding. I have stopped and watched them sitting inside the car messing aorund on their laptop and getting peoples number plates. This is confirmed by the new camera sign outside Somerfield, and the camera sign on the side of their vehicle.


Stopping speeding is supposedly to increase safety and NOT to raise money. This is why speed cameras now get painted yellow so they are more visible. If its all about safety then why are they parking illegally at a junction for over three hours causing more danger as people pulling out from the junction have their view obscured ??


If you park illegally you deserve a ticket. Same applies if you speed. But there are ways and means of catching people without adding to the problem themselves.



interested to know what the bleating was about and if it is really comparable


For sure if they are parking there needlessly just because they can then yeah that's not great but it doesn't really warrant the multiple threads that it seems to. Yes the council should set a good example - we agree on that - but all teh grumbling about councils, and money-making and so on ignores the root cause. And no-one seems to want to talk about that, far happier to complain endlessly about the council, which is just externalising the problem

Didn't take that long to find ;-)


"oh dear god - "chemists" and "newsagents" and their endless cross-selling is a good one. No Mr WH Smith not only did I not want half a kilo of chocolate with my paper, but I don't want you slipping fekkin flyers for Dominoes and god knows what else in there either - stop it!!! "



SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> interested to know what the bleating was about and

> if it is really comparable

>

On a more serious note...


Reply just received from the council (on a Sunday morning too! wow) re their vehicle parked on the yellow lines opposite ESPH. Even the council officials don't like what their contractors are doing....


"I will see to it that the matter is raised again with our enforcement

contractor.

In regards of condoning it, the answer is no I don't, and I expect

operatives to park in locations which are safe and not blocking the

footway. On occasions they will park on single/double yellow lines to

carry out their duties.


Regards


Nicky Costin

Road Network, Parking and Marina

Business Manager"



So the answer is... every time you see one of the council vehicles parked dangerously, send a photo to Mr Costin.

Presumably the contractors will get the message eventually.

Sean: "If the roads are dangerous places it isn't because of these wardens"


It is when they obstruct the mouth of a junction. It's an endorsable offence, like parking on the brow of a hill, or on zig-zags.


Sean, this is not just about flaunting parking regs to ticket motorists, this is about dangerous parking. If a Saturday shopper parked where this car was parked and a fatal accident occured, you'd be one of the first in line calling for action.


Parking in a loading bay/on a single yellow/permit zone to nab illegal parkers - cheeky, at worst hypocritical, but not the end of the world.

Parking in a position which endangers other road users - illegal and dangerous.


They aren't used for speeding BTW, it's purely parking enforcement. So any 'safety' argument is blown out the window, unless they're able to nab themselves.


Plus, they leave the engine running to power their equipment. Aside from the environmental aspect, that's an offence too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...