Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Man dresses as schoolgirl in public and gets ASBO !


There's no mention of this guy doing anything untoward / malicious to anyone so isn't this all a bit draconian ?


If he's been doing anything abusive, or planning to, in respect of school kids then fair enough, but if it's simply what he likes to stroll out in then isn't that everyone else's issue to get over ? I mean if that's his thing.


I may feel 'harassed, alarmed or distressed' when I see somebody walk past with piercings on every inch of their face and tattoos across their forehead but if they're not threatening anybody what is the problem.


To be fair - the implication is something perverse is going on, but I don't see why they have not mentioned it if that is the case, unlikely that the opportunity to paint him explicitly as a perv would be missed if it was there for the taking.

that story reads quite differently to the headline you put up there KK


The fact that he CAN wear the uniform, just not at certain times, suggests the original reason for the asbo is a bit more involved than asbo-gone-mad type headlines

Steve,


I have asked you already (in private) to try and keep the Drawing Room for serious discussion. If you, or anyone else, cannot manage this in relation to men and schoolgirls I shall have to move this to the lounge.


I presume the OP wanted a serious debate on this matter. Please respect that.


Regards


The Chair.

He was accused of flashing last Feb.


Transvestite flasher Pete Trigger faces a prison sentence after he flashed at parents and their children on the school run in Northampton. Trigger, 59, denied deliberately exposing himself to three women and their children ? who were as young as eight months old ? but was found guilty by Northampton magistrates yesterday. Two mothers told the court they saw Trigger, of Farndon Close, Thorplands, bend over wearing only a blue work coat. They said he intentionally showed his genitals to the group as they walked home from Woodvale Primary School in Crestwood Road, Thorplands. Trigger also came to the court's attention before Christmas when he was given an ASBO banning him from dressing like a schoolgirl or baring his legs. One of the parents, who cannot be identified, said: "His jacket came down to his knees and he had nothing on his legs apart from socks and shoes on his feet. It's a bit strange at school hours dressed like that with nothing on the bottom half. "He was walking in front and he bent over deliberately, picking up rubbish. It made me feel horrible letting my son see that. It did traumatise him. It was disgusting." Returning a guilty verdict, Kevin Foreman, presiding magistrate, said: "We are ordering a report to enable us to sentence properly. It is an all-options report so custody is a possibility."

TE44 - Thanks or the further detail. So there was (going by the info you posted) more to it than just 'dressing up' and hence I can now understand the reason for restrictions being imposed.


Sean - the comment "Mr Trigger was given a five-year Asbo in December 2008 after waiting near a primary school dressed as a schoolgirl" in the article was what led me to believe he had got an ASBO for wearing a schoolgirl outfit. I'l have to try harder in future.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...