Jump to content

Free Covid-19 home tests available now


Sue

Recommended Posts

Hoi Polloi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pointless if Chinese manufactured kits are used

> that are not accurate.



To the best of my knowledge the tests being used by the NHS are accurate, however no test is 100% accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh great.


I ordered a test kit yesterday.


It has just arrived (nearly 5pm).


On opening it, I see that one is asked to book a registered courier to collect the test sample.


On going to book the courier, I find a page saying "This service is currently closed and will open again tomorrow at 8am".


On further investigation, I find that I must book a courier by 4pm to ensure a pick up the next day.


So I can't book a courier until tomorrow. I then have to do the test tomorrow night, and the courier picks up on Sunday.


I have just phoned the Covid helpline to confirm that my understanding is correct, and that I can't book a courier tomorrow to collect the same day (Saturday)



So that is three days wasted, on top of several days when I couldn't book a home test at all because none were available.


My GP surgery said on Thursday that it was still worth having a test even though I had already lost a few days, but really, this is ridiculous.


I have registered a complaint, but what's the point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And when you do the test, it'll be recorded in

> Govt statistics as 'two tests', no ?!


Probably.


When I tried this morning to book a courier collection, the site wouldn't accept the number on my label.


I had to phone the helpline yet again and they put it through at their end with no difficulty.


The guy said there have been massive problems with the home testing system, including couriers not collecting completed tests at all 😮


I don't know why I'm bothering as it's so late now it's bound to give a negative result, but I don't want to be in the stats as someone who requested a test and then didn't return it.


A GP on the helpline when I first got symptoms told me I almost certainly had the virus, but at that time as there were no home tests available I should just proceed on the assumption I had it.


However although it makes no practical difference, I would quite like to know if I did. My partner got it (but less badly) a few days later and has also requested a test.


We are both pretty pissed off as we had been extremely careful quarantining/washing everything coming into the house, but clearly something slipped by somehow.


Just lucky neither of us had respiratory symptoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to point out that the home tests have a very poor record of accuracy - not because there is a problem with the testing kit itself, but because the actual sampling process (swabbing, effectively, the tonsils and then the back of the nose) is very difficult to do, particular on yourself, invasive and quite uncomfortable. So the samples taken are frequently of poor quality. In hospitals and testing centre the testers are more experienced, and frankly more brutal in getting their samples.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clutterqueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hope you get your result Sue, especially if you

> are within the first few days of your symptoms.



No, due to the lack of availability of home tests whenever I checked, and then delays, I am nowhere near the first few days of my symptoms.


The test was collected this morning, and the first definite symptoms were when I woke up on 15 May.


So it's highly unlikely I would get a positive result.




> I hope there can be a test in the future for

> people who think they might have had the virus in

> the past i.e. back in February and might have

> antibodies.



Yes hopefully one will become available, however as presently nobody knows whether having had the virus actually renders you immune, and if so how long for, I'm not sure what the point is.


If it meant you could go out without protection because you couldn't get infected again and/or you could no longer transmit the virus, obviously that would be brilliant, but currently I don't think that is the case :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
    • Hello again, Rubie, my cat, is still missing. He has been gone since 18th April.  Rubie is black and white, with black ears, a splendid white moustache, white front paws, and mostly white back legs.  Please check your sheds etc as he may be trapped, he’s a curious little thing.  I would really appreciate any help and suggestions. Thank you.
    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...