Jump to content

Southwark Electoral Registration Anomaly


ianr

Recommended Posts

In today's post I received a Confirmation of Voter Registration 2014 from Southwark Council. It has my name and nationality correct but does NOT have the Opt Out (of inclusion in edited register for sale) column ticked. It also has my address in the form [House Number] E22 9NF, London, [Actual Postcode].


I've always selected Opt Out since the option was introduced, and made no change when I last submitted my details online, via the Electoral Reform Society site, on 4 October 2013. My screen shots and a confirmation email from ERS, all of the same date, all confirm that I had selected Opt Out.


I'll be contacting the Southwark electoral registration office and James Barber about this, with copies of the evidence. I very much hope hope it's the case that Southwark are not yet selling the relevant edited edition.


I assume this hasn't happened just to me.


[Edited to enable proper display of the erroneous address: Phorum as configured treated my angle brackets as HTML commands. I have now emailed Southwark and James B]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had the same anomaly. My understanding is it's not a mistake, they are requiring everyone to pro actively opt out again.


Not impressed.


I just called them. If you renewed your details on line apparently there was no option to (re) opt out, so you were set to the default (of not being opted out). The option now exists so we all need to re update it, there is a period until the end of March to finish the updates and clarifications but it's something we need to do proactively, it won't revert without action.


(Just the messenger people)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ruffers. That seems to be it. Thanks. I do now remember looking at the change in legislation or administration, when the topic came up in a law newsgroup last year, but had expected official clarity, which in this case would have meant an accompanying explanation of the current request, rather than what looks like the same-old, and which states my _current_ status to be unopted-out.


No online option either. No Business Reply envelope, as previously. I think I shall use one from a previous year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As ruffers said, we got our confirmation form back yesterday and suddenly were no longer opted-out.


The half hearted explanation I got yesterday from the helpline was "oh, you need to pro-actively opt-out again". That seemed to be a decision designed to make it as hard as possible for people to opt out of having their details sold for commercial purposes (or that's how it seemed to me), so I sent a pretty narky email to the Electoral Services team saying so.


What I've just been told by someone different from the Electoral Services team is that it's all a mistake and the confirmation letter is in error, and that we are all still opted out. I don't think I'll take the chance that the second explanation is the right one, so will be amending my confirmation form to opt out again and send back to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a period of transition. This is from an Electoral Commission press release:


"The Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013, which received Royal Assent on 31 January 2013, provides for the introduction of Individual Electoral Registration. From summer 2014, each individual will need to provide their date of birth and national insurance number when they apply to register." http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/journalist/electoral-commission-media-centre/news-releases-reviews-and-research/major-change-to-electoral-registration-can-go-ahead-but-risks-to-address,-says-electoral-commission


I might look through the detailed EC stuff to see how far Southwark's practice matches their guidance (at http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/electoral-administrator/running-electoral-registration).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've so far found that, by virtue of The Electoral Registration (Postponement of 2013 Annual Canvass) Order 2013, the 1913 annual canvass relevant date of 15 October was changed, and a postponed canvass was to be made during the period 1 October 2013 to 17 February 2014 inclusive. The regulations then state:


"3.(1) Each registration officer in England must publish a revised version of their registers by 17th February 2014."


If that's so, a serious initial question now is, How accurate are the Confirmation of Voter Registration 2014 notices that we've just received? And if they do accurately state the currently held value of our deemed Opt Out statuses, have any copies of the Edited Version already been sold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,


Southwark Council's electoral registration officer has asked me to get in touch to apologise to you for the confusion caused and clarify what has happened with the 'opting out' option on the electoral registration forms.


We have been contacted by several residents about this issue, which has now been resolved. Due to a computer glitch, the residents who indicated that they wished to opt out of the edited register when they confirmed their elector details by telephone and by internet were sent a confirmation letter that indicated that they had not opted out, when they had in fact requested this.


As soon as we were aware of this problem we contacted our software suppliers. They were able to rectify the problem, and now all the residents who had requested an opt out have had their records updated. They will be sent another confirmation letter, indicating that they do indeed have the opt out of the edited register correctly recorded.


Some of the incorrect data had been passed to four credit reference agencies. We have now contacted them and they have deleted the incorrect data, which had not been used. We have replaced this information with the correct information. We would like to reassure residents that if they had opted out, their details are not held on record by any third parties as a result of this error.


Sorry again for the confusion.


Kind regards,


Louise Neilan

Media Manager

Southwark Council

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine is the same.. But it was my error...


Although my circumstances have not changed the last time I filled out the obligatory

for, the one you have to reply to from time to time(I do mine on line)I forgot to tick the OPT OUT Box.


I could just send back this form but not really that bothered..



DulwichFox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

louiseneilan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Some of the incorrect data had been passed to four

> credit reference agencies. We have now contacted

> them and they have deleted the incorrect data,

> which had not been used. We have replaced this

> information with the correct information. We would

> like to reassure residents that if they had opted

> out, their details are not held on record by any

> third parties as a result of this error.

>

This doesn't make sense to me, I'm afraid. Regulation 114 of the 2001 regulations explicitly permits sale of the full register to credit reference agencies. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/1871/regulation/15/made


Ed: This thread was moved, btw, from General ED Issues to the Lounge, in the last hour or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the explanation I've received from council officers:


"

From:

To: Barber, James;

Cc: Sent: Thu Feb 20 18:00:50 2014

Subject: RE: Urgent - possibility of unlawful publication


Hi James


A fuller response below:


Southwark Council's electoral registration officer has asked me to get in touch to apologise to you for the confusion caused and clarify what has happened with the 'opting out' option on the electoral registration forms.


We have been contacted by several residents about this issue, which has now been resolved. Due to a computer glitch, the residents who indicated that they wished to opt out of the edited register when they confirmed their elector details by telephone and by internet were sent a confirmation letter that indicated that they had not opted out, when they had in fact requested this.


As soon as we were aware of this problem we contacted our software suppliers. They were able to rectify the problem, and now all the residents who had requested an opt out have had their records updated. They will be sent another confirmation letter, indicating that they do indeed have the opt out of the edited register correctly recorded.


Some of the incorrect data had been passed to four credit reference agencies. We have now contacted them and they have deleted the incorrect data, which had not been used. We have replaced this information with the correct information. We would like to reassure residents that if they had opted out, their details are not held on record by any third parties as a result of this error.


Kind regards,

"


Not yet clear who will be landed with the bill of resending all this informaiton to tens of thousands of people at 50p a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you ianr, I never even noticed. Just glanced at it when it came.


Just dug the thing out of my filing pile and indeed there is no opt out tick where there should be one.


I'm assuming I'm one of the people who will be sent a corrected form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In today's post I received a Confirmation of Voter

> Registration 2014 from Southwark Council. It has

> my name and nationality correct but does NOT have

> the Opt Out (of inclusion in edited register for

> sale) column ticked. It also has my address in

> the form E22 9NF, London, .

>

> I've always selected Opt Out since the option was

> introduced, and made no change when I last

> submitted my details online, via the Electoral

> Reform Society site, on 4 October 2013. My screen

> shots and a confirmation email from ERS, all of

> the same date, all confirm that I had selected

> Opt Out.

>

> I'll be contacting the Southwark electoral

> registration office and James Barber about this,

> with copies of the evidence. I very much hope

> hope it's the case that Southwark are not yet

> selling the relevant edited edition.

>

> I assume this hasn't happened just to me.

>

>


I followed this thread from earlier this year (apologies for only quoting this message - I couldn't work out how to reference the whole thread) and contacted Southwark to re-confirm my opt-out. Today I have found out that I am NOT opted out and various organisations have bought my details via the electoral roll. Southwark are very apologetic and have reinstated my opt out. I'm letting the forum know in case the same thing has happened to others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...