Jump to content

The Family Room Discussion

Chat about schools, parental issues and advice, kids activities...


🧑‍🏫  Are you looking for or offering tutoring? Please post in the Tutors & Coaching board instead.

🤱 Need a nanny, babysitter or other childcare help? Ask in our Nanny & Childcare Services board.

📅 Are you hosting or looking for local events for children? Check out our Events Calendar.


19,810 topics in this forum

    • 1 reply
    • 825 views
  1. Tummy bug advice

    • 4 replies
    • 755 views
    • 0 replies
    • 668 views
    • 1 reply
    • 645 views
    • 15 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 3 replies
    • 712 views
    • 0 replies
    • 99 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.1k views
  2. Christmas presents...

    • 11 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 10 replies
    • 870 views
    • 3 replies
    • 576 views
    • 3 replies
    • 836 views
  3. Airport Transfer

    • 5 replies
    • 897 views
    • 3 replies
    • 581 views
    • 1 reply
    • 493 views
    • 0 replies
    • 570 views
    • 4 replies
    • 524 views
    • 0 replies
    • 490 views
    • 0 replies
    • 117 views
    • 3 replies
    • 638 views
    • 6 replies
    • 749 views
    • 4 replies
    • 2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 565 views
    • 2 replies
    • 671 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...