Jump to content

Request a Tradesperson

Need a job done? Require a plumber, builder, gardener...? Ask in here!


Subforums

  1. Cleaners

    Request regular cleaning, housekeeping, end of tenancy cleaning, window cleaning etc.

    842
    posts
  2. Tutors & Coaching

    Offering or request tuition or coaching - academic, language sport or musical.

    826
    posts

41,728 topics in this forum

    • 4 replies
    • 665 views
    • 0 replies
    • 428 views
    • 2 replies
    • 644 views
    • 1 reply
    • 799 views
    • 0 replies
    • 129 views
    • 4 replies
    • 3.3k views
  1. Gardening

    • 0 replies
    • 394 views
    • 3 replies
    • 900 views
    • 0 replies
    • 372 views
    • 4 replies
    • 468 views
    • 0 replies
    • 421 views
    • 18 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 873 views
    • 0 replies
    • 485 views
    • 0 replies
    • 454 views
  2. Gardener wanted

    • 0 replies
    • 415 views
    • 0 replies
    • 139 views
    • 0 replies
    • 131 views
  3. Bamboo removal

    • 10 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 497 views
    • 0 replies
    • 132 views
    • 0 replies
    • 394 views
    • 4 replies
    • 403 views
    • 0 replies
    • 589 views
    • 0 replies
    • 368 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...