Request a Tradesperson
Need a job done? Require a plumber, builder, gardener...? Ask in here!
Subforums
-
- 842
- posts
-
- 825
- posts
41,726 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 343 views
-
- 0 replies
- 184 views
-
- 1 reply
- 203 views
-
- 0 replies
- 151 views
-
- 0 replies
- 203 views
-
- 0 replies
- 168 views
-
- 2 replies
- 295 views
-
- 1 reply
- 281 views
-
- 2 replies
- 334 views
-
- 0 replies
- 207 views
-
- 0 replies
- 103 views
-
- 1 reply
- 212 views
-
- 0 replies
- 284 views
-
- 0 replies
- 209 views
-
- 1 reply
- 248 views
-
- 0 replies
- 105 views
-
- 1 reply
- 222 views
-
- 0 replies
- 246 views
-
- 0 replies
- 207 views
-
- 1 reply
- 272 views
-
- 0 replies
- 219 views
-
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
- 0 replies
- 297 views
-
- 0 replies
- 292 views
-
- 0 replies
- 334 views
.thumb.jpeg.04e709db1ae8916dac193281fe9870c0.jpeg)
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Aren’t there legal minimum sizes for various flats? Southwark Council sticks to the National standards which says 37 m² for a studio, 61 to 70 m² for three or four people in a two bedroom flat -
Where's a good place to have (a reasonably priced) Christmas lunch in ED in the next few weeks? -
By hannahkaty · Posted
if you want to get an idea of what the height would be like, the development on Bournemouth Road just off Rye Lane (where the Barclays is) is i think about 8 floors. So it's got height to it, but not Aylesham proposal height. The development above the f45 is also 7 floors. So the height in this instance doesn't necessarily bother me, rather the inevitable lack of a decent amount of affordable housing for local people and families. These "flats" look tiny, and i'd say are more like a really nice dorm room than anything else. -
-