General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,360 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 877 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2k views
-
- 42 replies
- 4.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 175 views
-
- 4 replies
- 889 views
-
- 0 replies
- 643 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 626 views
-
- 0 replies
- 617 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 11 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 438 views
-
- 0 replies
- 204 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 9 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 155 views
-
- 0 replies
- 793 views
-
- 71 replies
- 10.7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 791 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted
You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east. -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys! -
By Jenijenjen · Posted
The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing. -
Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me -
By David Peckham · Posted
I can see how it could've worked 20 or 30 years ago, when you couldn't swing a pool cue in the Foresters without hitting a sparks, a plumber or a chippy, but the area has changed somewhat. I'm not sure people around here have such trade-able skills these days. Have a word with someone in your local and you'll see. People are always going to need their boiler fixed, a damp patch sorted or their dimmer switch dimmed, but I can pretty much guarantee I'm never going need my corporate policy complied with, my social media planned, my data mined, my green transport tsared, my information architected or my analytics analysed. It reminds me of the great DIY con of the mid to late seventies. My Mum bought into it, my Dad didn't. Anyway, my Mum won out and we let the gardener go (he went on to be TV's Timmy Mallett, so that's a warning from history), but my Dad shorted the house out and singed his head when he cut through the flex on his new Black & Decker hedge trimmer. We all laughed, of course, but he got his own back when, because we didn't use a qualified electrician to do things properly, she electrocuted herself when she pulled the back of the plug off her Carmen heated rollers while it was still in the socket. Keep things professional, say 'No!' to this sort of nonsense. We pay people a decent rate of pay because they're specialists at these things. I did once barter my sister's space hopper and roller skates for twenty-odd square foot of crazy paving, though. That was a birthday present my Mum never forgot, and not in a good way.
-