General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,358 topics in this forum
-
- 5 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 37 replies
- 5.9k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 864 views
-
- 35 replies
- 7.3k views
-
- 21 replies
- 5.2k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 31 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 303 views
-
- 1 reply
- 233 views
-
- 1 reply
- 804 views
-
- 17 replies
- 3k views
-
- 26 replies
- 3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 225 views
-
- 0 replies
- 145 views
-
- 0 replies
- 137 views
-
- 72 replies
- 12.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 755 views
-
- 7 replies
- 4.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 642 views
-
- 24 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.2k views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
The "for sale" section on this forum lets people offer things for free or cheaply. There are also existing schemes like Freecycle, and food banks. Isn't that simpler than having a barter system? You might have something to give away, but the person who wants it might not have anything you want. Or have I misunderstood how it works? I can see that offering services free might not fit into existing schemes, but depending on what they were, what would happen if things went horribly wrong eg someone wrecked your house? Sorry if the above sounds very negative. -
I'm wondering why they would do that? Because surely positive reviews could only help them, and if they thought they might get negative reviews, shouldn't they have been addressing the reasons that might be (unless someone had an unwarranted grudge against them)? But in any case, how could they have stopped people posting reviews on here? PS I have corrected your typo! 😃
-
By OutOfFocus · Posted
Agreed. Just stating as a historic fact they tried to stiffle reviews. -
-