Jump to content

The Lounge

The place to relax and chat about anything.

22,774 topics in this forum

    • 1 reply
    • 496 views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 808 views
    • 4 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 3 replies
    • 766 views
    • 32 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 605 views
    • 118 replies
    • 6.8k views
    • 20 replies
    • 1.2k views
  1. Chicken cruelty 1 2

    • 27 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 11 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 7 replies
    • 810 views
    • 1 reply
    • 753 views
    • 0 replies
    • 150 views
    • 0 replies
    • 138 views
    • 0 replies
    • 133 views
    • 7 replies
    • 1.1k views
  2. Pen off sofa

    • 7 replies
    • 1k views
    • 3 replies
    • 1.1k views
  3. Leaders' Debate 1 2

    • 30 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 25 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 1 reply
    • 428 views
    • 1 reply
    • 652 views
    • 4 replies
    • 906 views
    • 16 replies
    • 1.7k views
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...