Jump to content

Southwark council now introducing a ray of charges, strapped cash, or generating more??


trinidad

Recommended Posts

The London Borough of Southwark have or are proposing extra charges in the borough, which has an affect of ED residents.


New charges to park at the lovely parks we have.


New charges for the brown bin / brown sacks.


Proposed new charges for a CPZ in the ED and West Peckham areas.


Increase Council tax bill


Is this the start of a strapped cash local authority, or an alternative to generate cash?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All councils are short of cash - the question is how do they generate it if government isn't providing enough and council tax can't be increased by more than a certain amount..


Do you generate cash from things people choose to do or things people need or even fines for littering and smoking or can we go after business somehow,if so what size ?


We (the residents of Southwark) should decide this so what we need is truth at the local elections (maybe ?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The alternative when a council is short of funds is to look internally to see where savings can be made

E.g. Reduce top executives pay , golden handshakes and so on


Or stop rewarding failure , caused by departments spending all their funding to ensure they retain the same amount for next year, classic example is highways who implement a raft of unwanted works at the end of each tax year but plead poverty when pot holes need to be repaired. Why not try asking them to bank unused money each year, still get the same funds next and when money is needed it's in the bank ? (I realise it's a change in legislation and attitude)


There are possibly many savings and ideas to be had to maximise the existing inwards revenue, but sadly a council isn't run like a business or charity, it seems to be have the ability to spend more then it generates, expecting central government, residents and businesses to pay more for "essential" services and bail them out.



On a simple note, still can't work out why they relocated to a purpose built office in London Bridge, the most expensive area for real estate and associated charges when it would have been cheaper in the south of the borough , like Peckham or Camberwell, with the benefit of council officers purchasing items (lunch, shopping....) close to where they work thus benefitting the local economy and strategic growth of these areas. Mad decision

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they did locate all services to Tooley Street they found the building was too small and so had to get a another building in New Cross. So Tooley Street was North and New Cross South.


Many of the closed neighbourhood housing offices were sold off.


Also I believe I read somewhere that Southwark is purchasing commercial properties for revenue.


There does seem to be a large pot of money somewhere to be able to do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...