immaterial

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Of course. > > Should'a guessed... 'Immaterial' it's like, > 'Whatever' > > Brendan, I think the challenge with those > political formats weren't technical, but > psychological. > > Humanity doesn't flourish in those environments. > The lack of reward for extra effort undermines the > desire to contribute, we work to the lowest common > denominator, we are atrophied. > > Most left wing revolutionaries don't envisage this > outcome, they merely demonstrate a poisonous greed > where the 'redistribution' of wealth gives them > more for doing less. This, Keef, as an example of rightist drivel. Ignoring the altruistic, cooperative, communitarian nature of man; focussing instead on the base, uncivilized drive to obtain more, whether that be profit or advantage over others. Immaterial, in the sense of without matter.

Well I came from Twickenham, via Hampton and Hanworth, but I've never read such rabid, rightist drivel! It's as if the last 30 years of privatision, financial corruption, continual war (Gulf wars I and II, Afghanistan) and relentless pursuit of profit, heralded by Mrs. T., continued by Labour and about to be resumed by Cameron's 'New' Coservative Party, never came to pass. Let's have some reasoned, objective analysis of the political economy, then and now, I implore you all!

Helluva lot of right-wing, blinkered bias on this forum. How is it that you've all gravitated to East Dulwich?

Dogma