Jump to content

missus

Member
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Has anyone seen the film yet? What did you think of it?
  2. I tried this diet for 10 days and by the end I felt as though I had a balloon in my stomach - MOST uncomfortable! After a while I was so f**ked off at having to try and think up a reasonably desirable meal (one which didn't involve another egg, which is essentially all you end up eating btw) that I ended up eating very little during the first 'protein-only' period despite being consistently hungry. Eating half a packet of ham makes you feel like a freak and worst of all, not even full!! Needless to say, I was really peeved to have endorsed this diet, especially at the cost of giving Mnsr. Dukan a further ?6. I should have put that money towards a gym membership. Why oh why do we women buy into this crap?! These things only work if you've got a fair old bit of weight to shed in the first place (wherein the smallest changes to your diet make all the difference).
  3. Hi Busy bee, Do you do any packages?! In desperate need of a body scrub and a facial... Dermalogica would be perfect! ...Also, whereabouts are you based? :)
  4. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/house-and-home/property/squatters-rights--and-wrongs-2144131.html This makes for an interesting read, for both sides of the debate... I personally disagree with squatting in this day and age where living costs are so expensive. Don't see why you should have the choice of opting out of paying via living in someone elses, albeit empty, house who IS paying for it. But hey, thats just my POV.
  5. Are you actually rising to the bait here, forumers!? Use your noggins, chums!
  6. Quoting from The Sun is a slippery slope rahnd' these parts, squire!
  7. @Sue "However I have neither the time nor inclination to do the necessary research to back up my opinion" ....but you have the time to rip others to shreds if they can't be arsed?!
  8. > I reckon assuming and labelling people who might > not want someone living permanently in a van > outside their own house as 'daily mail' types > sounds like raising beliefs to the status of > truths where in fact they are just opinions that's > all. >:D< You tell 'em quids! Also, has anybody who has become chums with TCVM asked him why he doesn't park nearer to/on the premises of his vehicle renting site in London Bridge?! It's a good half an hour/hour drive in rush hour and strikes me as illogical... Especially if he's got to do it every day?!
  9. Just drop it Horsebox, you're probably double my age and I'm pretty certain thats where your superiority ends. At least my posts expressed an opinion, that RS had a right to be annoyed; you just joined in when you found somebody to hound. Please go away now. KK called time on this tittle tattle 4 posts ago - keep up.
  10. Resorting to personal condescension? How terribly mature of you.
  11. I've posted 5 times out of 105 posts.... So please don't chat such horse'box'. Funny how everyone jumps on the band wagon and ignores the questions posed.... Anyway, at risk of using myself as bait for an argument that I never started, I'll resign myself to cowering away with all my other bigot friends in our 'campervan' hating club. Happy?
  12. Well jheez if you are all so bloody personal about it, why don't you personally invite TCVM to come at stay at yours? Then you can feel as satisfied in your righteousness as all your posts suggest, and there will be no more van. Problem solved for everyone.... Oh no wait, you are only concerned about fighting bigotry on a messaging forum but, when it comes to it, you don't really practise the samaritanism you preach! So excuse me if I don't take your flogging all too seriously... And Willard, thank you so much for your amusing parody of my words (Chicken Kiev, eh? How presumptuous of you!) but you are lowering yourself to the 'depths' of those you are criticising.... Chastising inconsistency with inconsistency?! Anyone would think you're trolling, sir. Let's just agree to disagree, shall we? And be thankful for the anonymity of this forum... Heaven knows it wouldn't be quite the communal bliss if we all spoke of our differing POVs to each others faces over our mochalocachinos.
  13. KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- 'there's a big gulf between slagging off a complete stranger for not having the 'lifestyle' you choose and calling someone a bigot (stranger or not) who has demonstrated a classic case of, ermm, bigotry...' I presume you didn't read the part where I said that I don't have a problem with anybody elses lifestyle; 'people can live wherever and do whatever they want as far as I care (provided it its not disrupting my life)'. I was just defending RS's right to be annoyed simply because it was disrupting her life, and I'm sure The Campervan Man will agree, after an extremely disruptive party (intended or otherwise)she and other neighbours have full right to be. Anyone can see that, in hosting a party in a quiet residential area in an unknown van, TCVM has fulfilled the negative expectations of his newfound neighbours BUT at least he came on to apologise.... what more can you ask for? Especially since it provides the necessary closure for this otherwise extraordinarily tedious thread.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...