Loz

DJKillaQueen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Any idiot can see there's something not right with a system where the vast majority of wealth, > power and influence in is the hands of less than 1% of those living on the planet. But really, when has that not been the case? It's hardly a new phenomenon.

The usual suspects, with the usual slogans. Nothing new. Nothing to see here.

ad2000 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yummy mummy is a slang term used in the United > Kingdom to describe young, attractive and wealthy > mothers. > > I'm in a bit of a pickle - I am old, ugly and > poor. Can I still take me kids to the boozer? Actually, 'yummy mummy' is a term used by the mothers themselves to try and give their egos a boost. Everyone else uses MILF, and usually not about the ones that try the yummy mummy self-con.

Thomas Micklewright Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > here here djkilla Though it's worth remembering that it applies to veggies too, Thomas. Pesticides, fungicides, genetic modification...

Whatever you do, DON'T ANSWER THE TRICK QUESTION asking which option of CPZ you would prefer. Leave it blank.

Q. How can you tell someone has an iPhone? A. They tell you every bloody 10 minutes.

Mmmm. Panda.

Whilst I agree with you, I would rather the council spend the money it would cost to replace 45,000 bins far more wisely. The mistake has been made - we are just going to have to live with it.

lilly123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > dont think that is a nice attitude to > take, when trying to help others do you??? So was this your dog, or are you just passing the message on? If the latter, do you know the owners?

http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/305462_10150459984448012_649083011_10978934_340803525_n.jpg

... but surely if you get Sky Sports via BT Vision you are still contributing to the Murdoch drinking fund?

I think we are supposed to guess from the description.

Thumbs up for Hamlets Health Club. Doesn't have a pool though.

More face to wash, though.

How's the fishing, Mick?

Senor Chevalier Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Presumably it is now only a matter of time before Ed suggests that it needs to be raised to the > right level and not the wrong level. That the Torys are wrong, wrong, wrong and are going too > far too fast. And that we should all get on board his plan to raise the limit to 78mph. Quality satire, SC. :))

Are they being removed or moved? Any for sale or event advertising posts will be pushed off in to the correct sections. Check your posting record (click on your name in any of your posts) - your posts will probably still be around somewhere.

I saw Caroline Flint on QT last night. Passionate, knowledgeable - what Harriet Harman might have been if she didn't have that rather unlikeable quality. I reckon they may have a potential future leader there.

I may be. I obviously never realised it.

Nope, but I've got an audition to be in the opening ceremony!

You are right in that anything too left field (or even left of centre!) would be suicide at the ballot box, but I was still looking for something that differentiates Labour. Something that would make we want to vote for them again. I just cannot see what that is at the moment. At the moment it is all slightly right of centre policies across all three parties, with the varying degrees of authoritarianism and nanny-state-ism to back them the only differentiator.

Chippy Minton Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I thought his speech was ok, but it was pretty > shameful for the rest of them to boo Tony Blair. > Extremely short memories of Labour's most > successful PM ever! I think there is a perception in the Labour party that Blair was the second most successful Tory PM in modern times!

I came out think I know now what Ed Miliband isn't, but rather less sure about what he is. I agree he has a rather likeable unflashyness about him, which makes a nice change from the careful control of Blair and Cameron. The problem is that there is really nothing radical in there. It is all 'we're not as bad as the Tories', rather than any major shift. The tuition fees was a case in point - radical headlining would be to seriously cut or even remove tuition fees by, say, reducing undergrad courses to two intensive years. But no, instead it is 'cutting' them to only double what they used to be, instead of the Coalition's tripling. As for anything else significant, the major headline seemed to be 'we will rein in business and high salaries'. Then witness the furious backpedalling this morning when there was the perception that he had offended business. I am just not seeing any opposition. No real alternative.

Which agent? Is it in the window? Is it listed on Rightmove & Globrix? I'd get some friends to do a mystery shopper exercise. I did that a few years ago when my house was on the market and the agent failed spectacularly. My friends virtually described our house/location and it wasn't suggested to them.

Also, stick an ad on the EDF Residential property section.